Foundations of experiential knowledge: recovering a forgotten resource for social work

This article explores the conceptual and theoretical foundation of experiential knowledge. A scoping review shows that limited studies have so far been published about experiential knowledge in the context of social work. Although the value of personal experiences is commonly acknowledged, these are generally not considered ‘real knowledge’. Two main problems are identified, the first being that in dominant positivist scientific conceptions, experiential knowledge is not seen as scientifically relevant. The second is that, epistemologically, it seems problematic to turn personal experiences into collective knowledge. Regarding the first issue, it is argued that from a social-constructivist angle, experiential knowledge is valid knowledge. Not only can denying the value of knowledge based on lived experiences be considered an epistemic injustice, but it also ignores it as a valuable resource for professional education and practice. The second issue needs to be further explored considering the complex processes of experiential knowledge production, using the opportunities that narrative and participative social work research methods offer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Social Work Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768y2024d000000022
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foundations of experiential knowledge: recovering a forgotten resource for social work

Jean Pierre Wilken, Elena Cabiati
6 citations
European Social Work Research
Social Work Education and Practice
5.14
article

Foundations of experiential knowledge: recovering a forgotten resource for social work

Jean Pierre Wilken, Elena Cabiati
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This article explores the conceptual and theoretical foundation of experiential knowledge. A scoping review shows that limited studies have so far been published about experiential knowledge in the context of social work. Although the value of personal experiences is commonly acknowledged, these are generally not considered ‘real knowledge’. Two main problems are identified, the first being that in dominant positivist scientific conceptions, experiential knowledge is not seen as scientifically relevant. The second is that, epistemologically, it seems problematic to turn personal experiences into collective knowledge. Regarding the first issue, it is argued that from a social-constructivist angle, experiential knowledge is valid knowledge. Not only can denying the value of knowledge based on lived experiences be considered an epistemic injustice, but it also ignores it as a valuable resource for professional education and practice. The second issue needs to be further explored considering the complex processes of experiential knowledge production, using the opportunities that narrative and participative social work research methods offer.

European Social Work ResearchVol. 2(3)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), University of Milan (IT), University of Tartu (EE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Work Education and Practice
5.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Foundations of experiential knowledge: recovering a forgotten resource for social work — Jean Pierre Wilken, Elena Cabiati · European Social Work Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS