A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project

A comprehensive list of trustworthiness checks has been produced. The checks will be evaluated to determine which should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111512
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project

George Athanasios Antoniou, Andreas Lundh, Lisa Parker, Ella Flemyng et al.
10 citations
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.61
article

A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project

George Athanasios Antoniou, Andreas Lundh, Lisa Parker, Ella Flemyng, Darren Lawrence Dahly, Alison Avenell, Kyle Alexander Sheldrick, Madelon van Wely, Calvin Heal, Kylie E Hunter, Steph Grohmann, Jo C Dumville, Sarah F. Lensen, Nicholas J. L. Brown, Lyle C. Gurrin, Lisa Anne Bero, Jack Dale Wilkinson, Emily Lam, Jill Alison Hayden, Emma Sydenham, Virginia M. Barbour, Anna Lene Seidler, Esmée M Bordewijk, Toby J Lasserson, Jamie J Kirkham, Mike J Clarke, Tianjing Li, Gideon Meyerowitz‐Katz, Barbara K. Redman, Neil Edward O'Connell, Jianping Liu, Ben Willem Mol
article en
10 citations

Abstract

A comprehensive list of trustworthiness checks has been produced. The checks will be evaluated to determine which should be included in the INSPECT-SR tool.

Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 175
Queen's University Belfast (GB), The University of Sydney (AU), Dalhousie University (CA), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Wollongong (AU), Linnaeus University (SE), University College Cork (IE), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), University of Manchester (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cheshire West and Chester (GB), Cochrane (DK), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Monash University (AU), New York University (US), Brunel University of London (GB), Cochrane (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.