Gender-based emergency response and crisis management knowledge assessment: A cross-sectional study on Chinese tertiary student

While disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been thoroughly examined, the significance of gender in Chinese university students' emergency response (ER) and crisis management (CM) knowledge remains questionable. Though the significance of DRR is becoming more widely recognized, more needs to be known about how male and female students see potential risks and respond to emergencies. Using Krathwohl's knowledge typology to give a structured analysis, this study investigates gender-specific differences in ER and CM knowledge to close this gap. These distinctions must be understood to create gender sensitive DRR approaches. Thereafter, this cross-sectional study assessed ER and CM knowledge in 388 university students in Jiangxi Province, China, using a self-structured questionnaire. In contrast to conventional ideas that propose distinct gender differences, our results show more subtle distinctions. Though general knowledge levels were comparable across each gender, certain distinctions surfaced, such as the fact that female students were better at addressing threats such as electrocution, while male students understood natural threats such as cyclones better. In addition, these variations were affected by family contexts and academic backgrounds. The results underscore the necessity of DRR programs that consider these gender-based differences to improve their efficacy. In response to emergencies, policymakers ought to adapt interventions to accommodate the unique strengths and requirements of each gender. To gain a comprehensive understanding of these disparities, future research should investigate supplementary variables, including cultural influences and socio-economic status, and implement longitudinal methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104800
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-based emergency response and crisis management knowledge assessment: A cross-sectional study on Chinese tertiary student

Md. Atikur Rahaman, M M Abdullah Al Mamun Sony, Mohammad Bin Amin, Xia Yu et al.
9 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
10.19
article

Gender-based emergency response and crisis management knowledge assessment: A cross-sectional study on Chinese tertiary student

Md. Atikur Rahaman, M M Abdullah Al Mamun Sony, Mohammad Bin Amin, Xia Yu, Predushchenko Olga
article en
9 citations

Abstract

While disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been thoroughly examined, the significance of gender in Chinese university students' emergency response (ER) and crisis management (CM) knowledge remains questionable. Though the significance of DRR is becoming more widely recognized, more needs to be known about how male and female students see potential risks and respond to emergencies. Using Krathwohl's knowledge typology to give a structured analysis, this study investigates gender-specific differences in ER and CM knowledge to close this gap. These distinctions must be understood to create gender sensitive DRR approaches. Thereafter, this cross-sectional study assessed ER and CM knowledge in 388 university students in Jiangxi Province, China, using a self-structured questionnaire. In contrast to conventional ideas that propose distinct gender differences, our results show more subtle distinctions. Though general knowledge levels were comparable across each gender, certain distinctions surfaced, such as the fact that female students were better at addressing threats such as electrocution, while male students understood natural threats such as cyclones better. In addition, these variations were affected by family contexts and academic backgrounds. The results underscore the necessity of DRR programs that consider these gender-based differences to improve their efficacy. In response to emergencies, policymakers ought to adapt interventions to accommodate the unique strengths and requirements of each gender. To gain a comprehensive understanding of these disparities, future research should investigate supplementary variables, including cultural influences and socio-economic status, and implement longitudinal methodologies.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 112
University of Debrecen (HU), Jiujiang University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Disaster Management and Resilience
10.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.