Systemic bank runs without aggregate risk: How a misallocation of liquidity may trigger a solvency crisis

We develop a general equilibrium model of self-fulfilling bank runs. The key novelty is the way in which the banking system’s assets and liabilities are connected. Banks issue loans to entrepreneurs who sell goods to households, which in turn pay for the goods by redeeming bank deposits. The return on bank assets is thus contingent on households being able to withdraw their deposits. In a run, not all households that wish to consume manage to withdraw, since part of banks’ cash reserves end up in the hands of households without consumption needs. This misallocation of liquidity lowers revenues of entrepreneurs and bank asset returns, thereby rationalising the run. Interventions that restrict redemptions in a run can be self-defeating due to their negative effect on demand in goods markets. We show how runs can sometimes be prevented with combinations of deposit freezes and redemption penalties as well as with the provision of emergency liquidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economics
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103929
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic bank runs without aggregate risk: How a misallocation of liquidity may trigger a solvency crisis

Lukas Voellmy, Lukas Altermatt, Hugo van Buggenum
7 citations
Journal of Financial Economics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
3.77
article

Systemic bank runs without aggregate risk: How a misallocation of liquidity may trigger a solvency crisis

Lukas Voellmy, Lukas Altermatt, Hugo van Buggenum
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We develop a general equilibrium model of self-fulfilling bank runs. The key novelty is the way in which the banking system’s assets and liabilities are connected. Banks issue loans to entrepreneurs who sell goods to households, which in turn pay for the goods by redeeming bank deposits. The return on bank assets is thus contingent on households being able to withdraw their deposits. In a run, not all households that wish to consume manage to withdraw, since part of banks’ cash reserves end up in the hands of households without consumption needs. This misallocation of liquidity lowers revenues of entrepreneurs and bank asset returns, thereby rationalising the run. Interventions that restrict redemptions in a run can be self-defeating due to their negative effect on demand in goods markets. We show how runs can sometimes be prevented with combinations of deposit freezes and redemption penalties as well as with the provision of emergency liquidity.

Journal of Financial EconomicsVol. 161
University of Essex (GB), Swiss National Bank (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.