Evaluation of the Stability and Antibacterial Activity of Burow’s and Neo-Burow’s Solutions was Prepared Using Different Methods

Burow's solution is a 13% aluminum acetate solution used for treating chronic suppurative otitis media. However, multiple formulations for Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions are used as in-hospital preparations. Each formulation uses different types and amounts of reagents, and takes a different time to prepare. Thus, the ions, including aluminum ion (Al<sup>3+</sup>), and other molecules in the prepared Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions are not identical, and the pH also differs. Furthermore, details about the antibacterial activity of these preparations are unknown. This study evaluated the stability and antibacterial activity of four Burow's and two neo-Burow's solutions prepared using different methods. Preparation times ranged from 20 min to 3 d, and the pH ranged from 2.2 to 4, meaning some solutions were more acidic or more basic than the pH 3 devised by Burow. In addition, the Al<sup>3+</sup> concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 1.51 mol/L, meaning some solutions were more concentrated or diluted than 13% aluminum acetate (0.64 mol/L). One of the Burow's solutions we prepared produced a white residue after 14 d, making it difficult to ensure stability. In addition, confirming the antibacterial activity of another Burow's solution against the test bacteria was problematic. Despite the differences in pH and Al<sup>3+</sup> concentrations between the various Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions, the antibacterial activity was equivalent. It was considered necessary to use the basic data obtained in this study to select a formulation for each hospital. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of each formulation in clinical settings will be a subject for future study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.24-00082
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Stability and Antibacterial Activity of Burow’s and Neo-Burow’s Solutions was Prepared Using Different Methods

Kaoru Hirose, Masako Kinoshita, Yohei Iizaka, Takehisa Hanawa et al.
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
article

Evaluation of the Stability and Antibacterial Activity of Burow’s and Neo-Burow’s Solutions was Prepared Using Different Methods

Kaoru Hirose, Masako Kinoshita, Yohei Iizaka, Takehisa Hanawa, Masaki Takigawa, Yojiro Anzai, Atsushi Urano, Rina Yamagishi, Hiroyuki Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Burow's solution is a 13% aluminum acetate solution used for treating chronic suppurative otitis media. However, multiple formulations for Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions are used as in-hospital preparations. Each formulation uses different types and amounts of reagents, and takes a different time to prepare. Thus, the ions, including aluminum ion (Al<sup>3+</sup>), and other molecules in the prepared Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions are not identical, and the pH also differs. Furthermore, details about the antibacterial activity of these preparations are unknown. This study evaluated the stability and antibacterial activity of four Burow's and two neo-Burow's solutions prepared using different methods. Preparation times ranged from 20 min to 3 d, and the pH ranged from 2.2 to 4, meaning some solutions were more acidic or more basic than the pH 3 devised by Burow. In addition, the Al<sup>3+</sup> concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 1.51 mol/L, meaning some solutions were more concentrated or diluted than 13% aluminum acetate (0.64 mol/L). One of the Burow's solutions we prepared produced a white residue after 14 d, making it difficult to ensure stability. In addition, confirming the antibacterial activity of another Burow's solution against the test bacteria was problematic. Despite the differences in pH and Al<sup>3+</sup> concentrations between the various Burow's and neo-Burow's solutions, the antibacterial activity was equivalent. It was considered necessary to use the basic data obtained in this study to select a formulation for each hospital. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of each formulation in clinical settings will be a subject for future study.

YAKUGAKU ZASSHIVol. 144(9)
Toho University (JP), Tokyo University of Science (JP), University of Tokyo Health Sciences (JP), Toho University Medical Center Sakura Hospital (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.