Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release

Nature-based climate solutions supply carbon credits generated from net carbon drawdown in exchange for project funding, but their credibility is challenged by the inherent variability and impermanence of drawdown. By evaluating drawdown benefits from a social cost of carbon perspective, project developers can enhance credibility and estimate impermanence by conservatively anticipating drawdowns to be eventually released following a release schedule, issuing additional credits when actual release is less severe than anticipated. We demonstrate how we can use ex post observations of drawdowns to construct optimal release schedules that limit the risk of credit reversals (when net drawdown is negative). We simulate both theoretical and real-life projects to examine how this approach balances the trade-off between generating credits evaluated as more permanent and limiting reversal risk. We discuss how this approach incentivizes project performance and provides a pragmatic solution to challenges facing larger-scale implementation of nature-based climate solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2390854
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release

Anil Madhavapeddy, James Gross, Andrew Balmford, E‐Ping Rau et al.
7 citations
Carbon Management
Forest Management and Policy
1.98
article

Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release

Anil Madhavapeddy, James Gross, Andrew Balmford, E‐Ping Rau, David A. Coomes, Srinivasan Keshav, Thomas Swinfield
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Nature-based climate solutions supply carbon credits generated from net carbon drawdown in exchange for project funding, but their credibility is challenged by the inherent variability and impermanence of drawdown. By evaluating drawdown benefits from a social cost of carbon perspective, project developers can enhance credibility and estimate impermanence by conservatively anticipating drawdowns to be eventually released following a release schedule, issuing additional credits when actual release is less severe than anticipated. We demonstrate how we can use ex post observations of drawdowns to construct optimal release schedules that limit the risk of credit reversals (when net drawdown is negative). We simulate both theoretical and real-life projects to examine how this approach balances the trade-off between generating credits evaluated as more permanent and limiting reversal risk. We discuss how this approach incentivizes project performance and provides a pragmatic solution to challenges facing larger-scale implementation of nature-based climate solutions.

Carbon ManagementVol. 15(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Forest Management and Policy
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.