Opening the black box: carbon-footprint calculators, meat consumption, and the “wicked problem” of metric governance

Carbon-footprint calculators are widely used as communication and education tools, designed to make people aware of the ways their personal actions contribute to greenhouse-gas emissions. However, they have come under criticism for emphasizing individual behavior versus structural change. We extend this critique to argue that carbon-footprint calculators are a form of “metric governance” that not only disciplines users but also constrains their abilities to engage with the complexities of climate change and social action. We focus on a particularly wicked problem of carbon-metric governance: livestock greenhouse-gas emissions. We show that carbon-footprint calculators black box and fix the complex politics and uncertainties around livestock-emissions metrics, thereby inhibiting users’ abilities to engage as deliberative subjects in the “wicked problem” of climate governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2390232
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opening the black box: carbon-footprint calculators, meat consumption, and the “wicked problem” of metric governance

E. Melanie DuPuis, Dustin Mulvaney
7 citations
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.21
article

Opening the black box: carbon-footprint calculators, meat consumption, and the “wicked problem” of metric governance

E. Melanie DuPuis, Dustin Mulvaney
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Carbon-footprint calculators are widely used as communication and education tools, designed to make people aware of the ways their personal actions contribute to greenhouse-gas emissions. However, they have come under criticism for emphasizing individual behavior versus structural change. We extend this critique to argue that carbon-footprint calculators are a form of “metric governance” that not only disciplines users but also constrains their abilities to engage with the complexities of climate change and social action. We focus on a particularly wicked problem of carbon-metric governance: livestock greenhouse-gas emissions. We show that carbon-footprint calculators black box and fix the complex politics and uncertainties around livestock-emissions metrics, thereby inhibiting users’ abilities to engage as deliberative subjects in the “wicked problem” of climate governance.

Sustainability Science Practice and PolicyVol. 20(1)
Pace University (US), San Jose State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.