<i>“</i>How do I put this gently?<i>”</i>: articulating the link between racial selectivity in the sexual market and neighborhood selection in the residential market of a global city

Abstract The global city is acted upon by a myriad of forces—commercial, cultural, diasporic, digital, identitarian, and political to name a few—on local, national, and transnational scales that produce steadily morphing patterns and concentrations of LGBTQ+ residential settlement in and across neighborhoods. Research has sought to unpack the push–pull factors and adhesive elements that exert influence on such residential configurations. This forum piece ventures to articulate empirically one such pattern that has not been approached in the literature, but has, as the title portends, been addressed in anecdote gently (read: cautiously) for some time: the link between an individual’s stated racial preference in sexual-partner choice and that individual’s selection of a neighborhood to live in that has a high percentage of residents of the preferred race.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Culture and Critique
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcae033
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“How do I put this gently?”: articulating the link between racial selectivity in the sexual market and neighborhood selection in the residential market of a global city

Nicholas Boston
Communication Culture and Critique
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

“How do I put this gently?”: articulating the link between racial selectivity in the sexual market and neighborhood selection in the residential market of a global city

Nicholas Boston
article en

Abstract

Abstract The global city is acted upon by a myriad of forces—commercial, cultural, diasporic, digital, identitarian, and political to name a few—on local, national, and transnational scales that produce steadily morphing patterns and concentrations of LGBTQ+ residential settlement in and across neighborhoods. Research has sought to unpack the push–pull factors and adhesive elements that exert influence on such residential configurations. This forum piece ventures to articulate empirically one such pattern that has not been approached in the literature, but has, as the title portends, been addressed in anecdote gently (read: cautiously) for some time: the link between an individual’s stated racial preference in sexual-partner choice and that individual’s selection of a neighborhood to live in that has a high percentage of residents of the preferred race.

Communication Culture and CritiqueVol. 17(3)
Lehman College (US), City University of New York (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>“</i>How do I put this gently?<i>”</i>: articulating the link between racial selectivity in the sexual market and neighborhood selection in the residential market of a global city — Nicholas Boston · Communication Culture and Critique (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS