Pupils’ Avoidance Strategies in Mathematics and their Perception of the Teachers’ Performance and Mastery

The aim of this research was to examine the attitudes of pupils about avoidance strategies in mathematics and their perception of the way mathematics teachers work. The research was conducted in the Republic of Serbia on a sample of 1165 primary school pupils. A quantitative approach was applied with a standardized instrument made up of five subscales which examined three avoidance strategies (novelty avoidance, providing assistance and self-handicapping) and two categories which include the style and method of the teacher’s work (targeted structured teaching and mastery). The results have shown that pupils are mostly inclined towards the novelty avoidance strategy. The research has also revealed some differences when it comes to pupils’ attitudes about avoidance strategies and their perception of the teacher’s approach in relation to their success at school and grade levels in mathematics. It was shown that the school location was a significant independent variable in determining the differences in pupils’ perceptions of the mastery of the teacher. It can be concluded that good didactic methodical organization of teaching, continuous monitoring of pupil progress, the teacher’s pedagogical approach, developing pupils’ skills in overcoming learning difficulties and monitoring their own work are some of the primary prerequisites for overcoming avoidance strategies and improving the educational work of teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-2-283-293
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pupils’ Avoidance Strategies in Mathematics and their Perception of the Teachers’ Performance and Mastery

Bisera Jevtić, Nevena Jevtić Trifunović, Danijela Milošević
International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education
Psychology of Development and Education
article

Pupils’ Avoidance Strategies in Mathematics and their Perception of the Teachers’ Performance and Mastery

Bisera Jevtić, Nevena Jevtić Trifunović, Danijela Milošević
article en

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the attitudes of pupils about avoidance strategies in mathematics and their perception of the way mathematics teachers work. The research was conducted in the Republic of Serbia on a sample of 1165 primary school pupils. A quantitative approach was applied with a standardized instrument made up of five subscales which examined three avoidance strategies (novelty avoidance, providing assistance and self-handicapping) and two categories which include the style and method of the teacher’s work (targeted structured teaching and mastery). The results have shown that pupils are mostly inclined towards the novelty avoidance strategy. The research has also revealed some differences when it comes to pupils’ attitudes about avoidance strategies and their perception of the teacher’s approach in relation to their success at school and grade levels in mathematics. It was shown that the school location was a significant independent variable in determining the differences in pupils’ perceptions of the mastery of the teacher. It can be concluded that good didactic methodical organization of teaching, continuous monitoring of pupil progress, the teacher’s pedagogical approach, developing pupils’ skills in overcoming learning difficulties and monitoring their own work are some of the primary prerequisites for overcoming avoidance strategies and improving the educational work of teachers.

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and EducationVol. 12(2)
University of Nis (RS)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.