A comparative study of platelet count by manual method and automated analyser: a retrospective study

Background: Platelets are essential for hemostasis and preventing bleeding. They are produced in the bone marrow at a rate of about 10 per day. The normal platelet count range is 150,000 to 450,000 per microliter of blood. Accurate platelet counts are crucial for diagnosing and managing related disorders. This study aims to promote advanced technologies and improve healthcare practices, enhancing patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study was included 199 individuals. Venous blood samples were collected in EDTA vacutainer tube for the estimation of platelet count in manual and automated method. The results were analysed using SPSS software Results: The average mean values of platelet in manual method were 208080 and in the automated method was 215979. Analysis of data obtained showed that there was a statically significant differences in manual and automated method of platelet count (p values 0.011). There was Significant differences among Thrombocytopenia, Normal, Thrombocytosis were observed in manual as well in automated method with p values less than 0.001. There were no significant differences in platelet counts across age and gender groups been observed in both the methods. Conclusion: The study found that the mean values of platelet in manual method was manual slightly higher compared to automated methods and showed statically significant. Additionally, there was a statistical difference between both the methods of platelet count among different patient groups However, no significant differences were observed in platelet counts based on gender or age groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20242611
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of platelet count by manual method and automated analyser: a retrospective study

K. M. Prajna, Chaithanya Ullas, M Gayathri
1 citations
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
0.40
article

A comparative study of platelet count by manual method and automated analyser: a retrospective study

K. M. Prajna, Chaithanya Ullas, M Gayathri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Platelets are essential for hemostasis and preventing bleeding. They are produced in the bone marrow at a rate of about 10 per day. The normal platelet count range is 150,000 to 450,000 per microliter of blood. Accurate platelet counts are crucial for diagnosing and managing related disorders. This study aims to promote advanced technologies and improve healthcare practices, enhancing patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study was included 199 individuals. Venous blood samples were collected in EDTA vacutainer tube for the estimation of platelet count in manual and automated method. The results were analysed using SPSS software Results: The average mean values of platelet in manual method were 208080 and in the automated method was 215979. Analysis of data obtained showed that there was a statically significant differences in manual and automated method of platelet count (p values 0.011). There was Significant differences among Thrombocytopenia, Normal, Thrombocytosis were observed in manual as well in automated method with p values less than 0.001. There were no significant differences in platelet counts across age and gender groups been observed in both the methods. Conclusion: The study found that the mean values of platelet in manual method was manual slightly higher compared to automated methods and showed statically significant. Additionally, there was a statistical difference between both the methods of platelet count among different patient groups However, no significant differences were observed in platelet counts based on gender or age groups.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 12(9)
Yenepoya University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study of platelet count by manual method and automated analyser: a retrospective study — K. M. Prajna, Chaithanya Ullas, et al. · International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS