University ambidexterity: assessing the nature of interdependence between knowledge exchange and knowledge creation in UK universities

Abstract The concept of university ambidexterity has been advanced to capture the simultaneous pursuit of exploration (research) and exploitation (knowledge exchange). While ambidexterity can enhance organisational performance, tensions and barriers have been identified suggesting it is far from straightforward to achieve. In light of this, it has been proposed that universities follow a ‘twisting learning path’ that alternates between exploration and exploitation. However, this violates the idea that innovation activities are persistent in nature. In order to assess the nature of the ambidexterity of UK universities, we use data from the UK Higher Education Business & Community Interaction survey to examine the temporal dynamics of the relationship between research and KE. Through estimating a suite of Panel Variance Auto Regressive models, our results suggest that university ambidexterity has three key characteristics: (1) a determinant temporal ‘path dependent’ effect, whereby research and KE activities exhibit a significant autoregressive component; (2) an inter-temporal bi-directional relationship between research and KE activities; and (3) short time lags between the implementation of research and KE coupled with the dissipation of the relationship over time that is indicative of a persistent relationship between the two. Consequently, we propose an alternative model of university ambidexterity by highlighting the continuous interdependency of research and knowledge exchange within UK universities and its persistent nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10137-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University ambidexterity: assessing the nature of interdependence between knowledge exchange and knowledge creation in UK universities

Peter Wells, Drew Woodhouse, Andrew Johnston
4 citations
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.22
article

University ambidexterity: assessing the nature of interdependence between knowledge exchange and knowledge creation in UK universities

Peter Wells, Drew Woodhouse, Andrew Johnston
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The concept of university ambidexterity has been advanced to capture the simultaneous pursuit of exploration (research) and exploitation (knowledge exchange). While ambidexterity can enhance organisational performance, tensions and barriers have been identified suggesting it is far from straightforward to achieve. In light of this, it has been proposed that universities follow a ‘twisting learning path’ that alternates between exploration and exploitation. However, this violates the idea that innovation activities are persistent in nature. In order to assess the nature of the ambidexterity of UK universities, we use data from the UK Higher Education Business & Community Interaction survey to examine the temporal dynamics of the relationship between research and KE. Through estimating a suite of Panel Variance Auto Regressive models, our results suggest that university ambidexterity has three key characteristics: (1) a determinant temporal ‘path dependent’ effect, whereby research and KE activities exhibit a significant autoregressive component; (2) an inter-temporal bi-directional relationship between research and KE activities; and (3) short time lags between the implementation of research and KE coupled with the dissipation of the relationship over time that is indicative of a persistent relationship between the two. Consequently, we propose an alternative model of university ambidexterity by highlighting the continuous interdependency of research and knowledge exchange within UK universities and its persistent nature.

The Journal of Technology TransferVol. 50(3)
University of Huddersfield (GB), Lund University (SE), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.