The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures

Abstract In this study, we conduct a panoramic analysis of two decades of open innovation (OI), leveraging topic modeling with machine learning to map out ten critical OI pathways and their associated failure mechanisms on the micro, meso, and macro levels. Open innovation has revolutionized organizational innovation, collaboration, and competition. However, it presents complexities that require a multifaceted approach to research. Our findings, informed by interpretative thematic analysis, reveal distinct scholarly debates and three primary controversies within the OI research landscape, pointing to the need for future research to integrate these diverse narratives. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of the OI field’s evolution and current state, along with an analysis of its underlying failure mechanisms, we aim to guide strategic decision-making in OI practice, and enrich the academic discourse on its operational and strategic dimensions. Finally, we highlight several potential avenues for future research that emerge from our synthesis of the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Managerial Science
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00804-7
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures

Maral Mahdad, Saeed Roshani
7 citations
Review of Managerial Science
Open Source Software Innovations
2.88
article

The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures

Maral Mahdad, Saeed Roshani
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we conduct a panoramic analysis of two decades of open innovation (OI), leveraging topic modeling with machine learning to map out ten critical OI pathways and their associated failure mechanisms on the micro, meso, and macro levels. Open innovation has revolutionized organizational innovation, collaboration, and competition. However, it presents complexities that require a multifaceted approach to research. Our findings, informed by interpretative thematic analysis, reveal distinct scholarly debates and three primary controversies within the OI research landscape, pointing to the need for future research to integrate these diverse narratives. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of the OI field’s evolution and current state, along with an analysis of its underlying failure mechanisms, we aim to guide strategic decision-making in OI practice, and enrich the academic discourse on its operational and strategic dimensions. Finally, we highlight several potential avenues for future research that emerge from our synthesis of the literature.

Review of Managerial ScienceVol. 19(6)
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Open Source Software Innovations
2.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures — Maral Mahdad, Saeed Roshani · Review of Managerial Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS