Effect of Scanbody Material and Mucosa Modification Technique on The Accuracy of Digital Impressions of Edentulous Arches with Multiple Implants

Aim: The aim of current research is to evaluate the effect of scanbody material and additional reference markers in the form of artificial landmarks on the accuracy of digital impressions of edentulous arches with multiple implants. Material and Methods: A model of an edentulous maxilla with six implants (BLT, RC, Institut Straumann, AG) was used as master model. PEEK and PMMA scanbodies were screwed on the implants and digital impressions were obtained with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS4, 3Shape). Reference markers made of flowable composite (C), gingival barrier material (GB), scannable silicone (S) were placed on the edentulous spaces and impressions were obtained. The master model was digitalized with an extraoral high-resolution reference scanner. Deviations of the predetermined points and inter-implant distances were calculated by using superimpositining technique. Results: Inter-implant distance measurements showed that PEEK scanbodies demonstrated better precision than PMMA scanbodies, (p<.001). In the subgroups, also PEEK groups were more accurate than PMMA groups (p<.001). Kruskal-Wallis test also showed statistical difference in deviations of the predetermined points among the groups in precision (p<.001). Addition of markers did not influence the precision and trueness in PEEK groups but in PMMA groups both in distance measurements and predetermined point deviations. Conclusion: Addition of reference markers does not make any significance in the accuracy of digital impressions when PEEK scanbodies are used. PMMA seems not to be an alternative material as scanbody material, addition of markers is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2024.96
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Scanbody Material and Mucosa Modification Technique on The Accuracy of Digital Impressions of Edentulous Arches with Multiple Implants

Bilge Gökçen Röhli̇g, Demet Çağıl Ayvalıoğlu, Görkem GÖKSOY
Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Effect of Scanbody Material and Mucosa Modification Technique on The Accuracy of Digital Impressions of Edentulous Arches with Multiple Implants

Bilge Gökçen Röhli̇g, Demet Çağıl Ayvalıoğlu, Görkem GÖKSOY
article en

Abstract

Aim: The aim of current research is to evaluate the effect of scanbody material and additional reference markers in the form of artificial landmarks on the accuracy of digital impressions of edentulous arches with multiple implants. Material and Methods: A model of an edentulous maxilla with six implants (BLT, RC, Institut Straumann, AG) was used as master model. PEEK and PMMA scanbodies were screwed on the implants and digital impressions were obtained with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS4, 3Shape). Reference markers made of flowable composite (C), gingival barrier material (GB), scannable silicone (S) were placed on the edentulous spaces and impressions were obtained. The master model was digitalized with an extraoral high-resolution reference scanner. Deviations of the predetermined points and inter-implant distances were calculated by using superimpositining technique. Results: Inter-implant distance measurements showed that PEEK scanbodies demonstrated better precision than PMMA scanbodies, (p<.001). In the subgroups, also PEEK groups were more accurate than PMMA groups (p<.001). Kruskal-Wallis test also showed statistical difference in deviations of the predetermined points among the groups in precision (p<.001). Addition of markers did not influence the precision and trueness in PEEK groups but in PMMA groups both in distance measurements and predetermined point deviations. Conclusion: Addition of reference markers does not make any significance in the accuracy of digital impressions when PEEK scanbodies are used. PMMA seems not to be an alternative material as scanbody material, addition of markers is needed.

Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Altınbaş University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.