Comparative Economic Evaluation of Integrated and Non-integrated Farming Systems in Northeastern Karnataka, India

Integrated Farming System (IFS) represented a holistic approach to managing farm resources, aimed at boosting productivity, minimizing environmental impact, enhancing incomes for resource-poor farmers, and ensuring agricultural sustainability. Multi-stage random sampling technique was used, beginning with Ballari district, followed by selecting one taluk with the highest net sown area, and then two villages within that taluk. From each village, 10 IFS and 10 non-IFS farmers were randomly selected, totaling 40 farmers. This study analyzed the costs and returns of major IFS and non-IFS practices in Ballari district, Karnataka. Data were collected from 40 farmers in two villages within Ballari taluk during the agricultural year 2017-18 and were analyzed using tabular and budgeting methods. The results revealed that farmers in the area used three distinct farming systems: IFS-I (Crop + Dairy), IFS-II (Crop + Dairy + Small Ruminants), and Non-IFS (Crop only). Major crops included paddy, dry chili, cotton, and jowar. The analysis showed that IFS-II, which integrated crops, dairy, and small ruminants, generated the highest net returns at ₹1,57,220.04, followed by IFS-I with ₹1,35,625.20, and Non-IFS with ₹60,698.11. To maximize benefits, there was a need to promote IFS-II more widely among farmers. Efforts were suggested through Raitha Samparka Kendra (RSK) and Krishi Vigyana Kendra (KVK) to advocate for IFS adoption, thereby enabling more efficient use of farm resources and improving productivity and profitability for farming households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Current Research International
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i7843
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Economic Evaluation of Integrated and Non-integrated Farming Systems in Northeastern Karnataka, India

Kumar Manish, T. N. Srinatha, B. J. Aravinda, Popavath Bhargav Naik et al.
Archives of Current Research International
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Comparative Economic Evaluation of Integrated and Non-integrated Farming Systems in Northeastern Karnataka, India

Kumar Manish, T. N. Srinatha, B. J. Aravinda, Popavath Bhargav Naik, D B Hemanth, R N Nalinashree, M S Jagadeesh, Pavan Kumar Kumawat
article en

Abstract

Integrated Farming System (IFS) represented a holistic approach to managing farm resources, aimed at boosting productivity, minimizing environmental impact, enhancing incomes for resource-poor farmers, and ensuring agricultural sustainability. Multi-stage random sampling technique was used, beginning with Ballari district, followed by selecting one taluk with the highest net sown area, and then two villages within that taluk. From each village, 10 IFS and 10 non-IFS farmers were randomly selected, totaling 40 farmers. This study analyzed the costs and returns of major IFS and non-IFS practices in Ballari district, Karnataka. Data were collected from 40 farmers in two villages within Ballari taluk during the agricultural year 2017-18 and were analyzed using tabular and budgeting methods. The results revealed that farmers in the area used three distinct farming systems: IFS-I (Crop + Dairy), IFS-II (Crop + Dairy + Small Ruminants), and Non-IFS (Crop only). Major crops included paddy, dry chili, cotton, and jowar. The analysis showed that IFS-II, which integrated crops, dairy, and small ruminants, generated the highest net returns at ₹1,57,220.04, followed by IFS-I with ₹1,35,625.20, and Non-IFS with ₹60,698.11. To maximize benefits, there was a need to promote IFS-II more widely among farmers. Efforts were suggested through Raitha Samparka Kendra (RSK) and Krishi Vigyana Kendra (KVK) to advocate for IFS adoption, thereby enabling more efficient use of farm resources and improving productivity and profitability for farming households.

Archives of Current Research InternationalVol. 24(7)
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.