Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma <i>in situ</i>: observational cohort study

There was no statistically significant difference in disease-specific survival between women operated with breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, or mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Given the low absolute risk of disease-specific mortality, these results provide confidence in offering individualized locoregional treatment without fear of compromising survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae198
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study

Samantha Thomas, Marc D. Ryser, Lars J. Grimm, Amanda L. Nash et al.
2 citations
British journal of surgery
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.57
article

Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study

Samantha Thomas, Marc D. Ryser, Lars J. Grimm, Amanda L. Nash, Elizabeth S. Frank, Alastair Mark Thompson, Amanda B. Francescatti, Ann H. Partridge, Terry Hyslop, Sabrina M. Wang, Thomas R. Lynch, Esther Hwang, Yan Li, Yi Ren, Anne Barber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There was no statistically significant difference in disease-specific survival between women operated with breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, or mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Given the low absolute risk of disease-specific mortality, these results provide confidence in offering individualized locoregional treatment without fear of compromising survival.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(9)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Duke University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US), American College of Surgeons (US)
Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, Pancreatic Cancer Action, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.