PENULISAN NAMA TUNGGAL DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS MUTAKHIR

This research concludes that certificate writing is dominated by men (single) due to religious/belief, socio-cultural and economic factors. Writing a single subject on the certificate doesn’t match the current principles because there is no match physical data and juridical data. Writing names singularly or plurally on a certificate has advantages and disadvantages in terms of the subject, rights and obligations and transferred. Singular and plural subjects physically have the right to use objects, but legally the subject written on the certificate has the right to transfer land rights. The rights and obligations of singular and plural writing are burdened by PBB and BPHTB. In single writing, during the process of transferring inheritance rights, the married couple is burdened by BPHTB unanimously without considering their roles. BPHTB calculation in plural writing reduces the payment obligations of the husband/wife because their role is recognized. When transferring rights to merge objects, objects that are recorded plurally, the merger process is simple because it does not require a name change, whereas in single writing adjustments are made and payments of taxes and other fees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Hukum to-ra Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v10i2.364
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PENULISAN NAMA TUNGGAL DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS MUTAKHIR

Hartini Hartini, Anindya Widha Puspita
Jurnal Hukum to-ra Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat
Legal Studies and Policies
article

PENULISAN NAMA TUNGGAL DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS MUTAKHIR

Hartini Hartini, Anindya Widha Puspita
article en

Abstract

This research concludes that certificate writing is dominated by men (single) due to religious/belief, socio-cultural and economic factors. Writing a single subject on the certificate doesn’t match the current principles because there is no match physical data and juridical data. Writing names singularly or plurally on a certificate has advantages and disadvantages in terms of the subject, rights and obligations and transferred. Singular and plural subjects physically have the right to use objects, but legally the subject written on the certificate has the right to transfer land rights. The rights and obligations of singular and plural writing are burdened by PBB and BPHTB. In single writing, during the process of transferring inheritance rights, the married couple is burdened by BPHTB unanimously without considering their roles. BPHTB calculation in plural writing reduces the payment obligations of the husband/wife because their role is recognized. When transferring rights to merge objects, objects that are recorded plurally, the merger process is simple because it does not require a name change, whereas in single writing adjustments are made and payments of taxes and other fees.

Jurnal Hukum to-ra Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi MasyarakatVol. 10(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.