A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods for the Inverted Modified Lindley Distribution

The Inverted Modified Lindley (IML) distribution has been shown to exhibit superior fitting capabilities compared to the exponential and Lindley distributions. This study investigates the parameter estimation of the IML distribution using the Least Squares (LS), Cramer von Misses (CvM), and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to compare the efficiency of the ML, LS, and CvM methods in estimating the parameters of the IML distribution. Moreover, real data applications from various fields are provided using related estimation methods. The fitting performance of these methods is evaluated using root mean squared error, coefficient of determination, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. According to the application results, the CvM estimates describe the considered data for the IML distribution best, while the simulation study favors ML estimation among the considered methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1488247
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods for the Inverted Modified Lindley Distribution

Kübra Bağcı
Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
article

A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods for the Inverted Modified Lindley Distribution

Kübra Bağcı
article en

Abstract

The Inverted Modified Lindley (IML) distribution has been shown to exhibit superior fitting capabilities compared to the exponential and Lindley distributions. This study investigates the parameter estimation of the IML distribution using the Least Squares (LS), Cramer von Misses (CvM), and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to compare the efficiency of the ML, LS, and CvM methods in estimating the parameters of the IML distribution. Moreover, real data applications from various fields are provided using related estimation methods. The fitting performance of these methods is evaluated using root mean squared error, coefficient of determination, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. According to the application results, the CvM estimates describe the considered data for the IML distribution best, while the simulation study favors ML estimation among the considered methods.

Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü DergisiVol. 14(3)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.