Quantity Take Off Comparison Using Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Autodesk Revit Software and Traditional Method

Nowadays, the development of technological advances and information has grown rapidly in various aspects including the development of construction projects. One of the construction technology innovations is Building Information Modeling (BIM). Obstacles that are often or commonly encountered in the implementation of construction projects are delays or delays in work, rework, and inaccuracies in the calculation of the required quantity. The problems caused by conventional methods can be minimized by utilizing construction technology, namely BIM at the construction stage. This research aims to compare the volume of traditional (conventional methods) and BIM methods. This research uses a comparative research method and quantitative approach. In this research, a comparative analysis between conventional methods and BIM methods is carried out. Based on the data analysis that has been carried out, it is found that the BIM results are smaller than the conventional project results with a percentage comparison difference of 8.61% for the volume of concrete work, and 6% for the weight of reinforcement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32734/ijau.v8i2.16146
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantity Take Off Comparison Using Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Autodesk Revit Software and Traditional Method

Syahrizal Syahrizal, Indra Jaya, Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan, Rezky Ariessa Dewi et al.
International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Quantity Take Off Comparison Using Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Autodesk Revit Software and Traditional Method

Syahrizal Syahrizal, Indra Jaya, Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan, Rezky Ariessa Dewi, Fredrick Jeremia Simatupang, Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon
article en

Abstract

Nowadays, the development of technological advances and information has grown rapidly in various aspects including the development of construction projects. One of the construction technology innovations is Building Information Modeling (BIM). Obstacles that are often or commonly encountered in the implementation of construction projects are delays or delays in work, rework, and inaccuracies in the calculation of the required quantity. The problems caused by conventional methods can be minimized by utilizing construction technology, namely BIM at the construction stage. This research aims to compare the volume of traditional (conventional methods) and BIM methods. This research uses a comparative research method and quantitative approach. In this research, a comparative analysis between conventional methods and BIM methods is carried out. Based on the data analysis that has been carried out, it is found that the BIM results are smaller than the conventional project results with a percentage comparison difference of 8.61% for the volume of concrete work, and 6% for the weight of reinforcement.

International Journal of Architecture and UrbanismVol. 8(2)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantity Take Off Comparison Using Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Autodesk Revit Software and Traditional Method — Syahrizal Syahrizal, Indra Jaya, et al. · International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS