Internationalized Students: Examining Students’ Experiences in Virtual Study Abroad Programs in Japan

This paper explored students’ experiences in an international virtual student mobility (VSM) program at a Japanese national university implemented in collaboration with partner universities in the Asia Pacific region and Europe. Through students’ narratives, the study discerned how students perceive “mobility” and the concept of “international students” after participating in a virtual student mobility program. Findings revealed a tension between students’ understanding of “mobility,” official narratives, and students’ actual experiences. While VSM programs facilitate communication and knowledge exchange across borders and develop cross-cultural communications, prevailing binary definitions in student mobility, such as “inbound” vs. “outbound,” “domestic” vs. “international,” or “study abroad” vs. “internationalization at home,” limit VSM potential to be fully realized. This misalignment of the traditional understanding of student mobility that emphasizes place and borders challenges the official narrative of student mobility and urges educators to re-align and re-frame how we understand “international students.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IAFOR Journal of Education
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.2.04
Primary Topic
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internationalized Students: Examining Students’ Experiences in Virtual Study Abroad Programs in Japan

Ariunaa Enkhtur, Ming Li
IAFOR Journal of Education
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
article

Internationalized Students: Examining Students’ Experiences in Virtual Study Abroad Programs in Japan

Ariunaa Enkhtur, Ming Li
article en

Abstract

This paper explored students’ experiences in an international virtual student mobility (VSM) program at a Japanese national university implemented in collaboration with partner universities in the Asia Pacific region and Europe. Through students’ narratives, the study discerned how students perceive “mobility” and the concept of “international students” after participating in a virtual student mobility program. Findings revealed a tension between students’ understanding of “mobility,” official narratives, and students’ actual experiences. While VSM programs facilitate communication and knowledge exchange across borders and develop cross-cultural communications, prevailing binary definitions in student mobility, such as “inbound” vs. “outbound,” “domestic” vs. “international,” or “study abroad” vs. “internationalization at home,” limit VSM potential to be fully realized. This misalignment of the traditional understanding of student mobility that emphasizes place and borders challenges the official narrative of student mobility and urges educators to re-align and re-frame how we understand “international students.”

IAFOR Journal of EducationVol. 12(2)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.