Effects of thoracic spine mobilization on chest expansion in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Background and Study Aim. Chronic mechanical neck pain significantly impacts the quality of life and functional capacity of individuals, often necessitating long-term management strategies. Traditional stretching exercises are commonly prescribed, but their effectiveness compared to other interventions remains underexplored. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of traditional stretching exercise regimens against thoracic spine and rib mobilization in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Material and Methods. This randomized controlled trial included 30 patients aged between thirty and fifty years, all suffering from mechanical neck pain. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, with 15 in each group (Group A: n=15; Group B: n=15). Group A received thoracic spine mobilization coupled with standard passive stretching exercises, whereas Group B underwent a traditional stretching exercise regimen. Both groups were evaluated using the visual analogy scale for pain, active cervical range of motion (ROM), and chest expansion, both before and after a two-week therapy course. Results. Findings from this study were analyzed using a two-way mixed-model multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results showed no significant differences between Group A (thoracic spine mobilization and standard passive stretching) and Group B (traditional stretching regimen) regarding pain intensity, active cervical range of motion, and chest expansion after the two-week intervention period (p > 0.05). However, significant improvements were observed within each group across all measured outcomes, including reductions in pain intensity and increases in cervical range of motion and chest expansion (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The study confirms that both passive stretching exercises and thoracic spine mobilization are beneficial interventions for enhancing physical outcomes in patients with mechanical nonspecific neck pain. These approaches are equally effective in improving overall physical functionality, underscoring their value in therapeutic settings for neck pain management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2024.0403
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of thoracic spine mobilization on chest expansion in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed, Dina S Abd Allah, Hanaa Ali Hafez, Asmaa Hossam et al.
1 citations
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
0.45
article

Effects of thoracic spine mobilization on chest expansion in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed, Dina S Abd Allah, Hanaa Ali Hafez, Asmaa Hossam, Mennaallahy Nasreldien, Osama yassin Abbas, Ahmed Ibrahim Elarian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. Chronic mechanical neck pain significantly impacts the quality of life and functional capacity of individuals, often necessitating long-term management strategies. Traditional stretching exercises are commonly prescribed, but their effectiveness compared to other interventions remains underexplored. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of traditional stretching exercise regimens against thoracic spine and rib mobilization in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Material and Methods. This randomized controlled trial included 30 patients aged between thirty and fifty years, all suffering from mechanical neck pain. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, with 15 in each group (Group A: n=15; Group B: n=15). Group A received thoracic spine mobilization coupled with standard passive stretching exercises, whereas Group B underwent a traditional stretching exercise regimen. Both groups were evaluated using the visual analogy scale for pain, active cervical range of motion (ROM), and chest expansion, both before and after a two-week therapy course. Results. Findings from this study were analyzed using a two-way mixed-model multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results showed no significant differences between Group A (thoracic spine mobilization and standard passive stretching) and Group B (traditional stretching regimen) regarding pain intensity, active cervical range of motion, and chest expansion after the two-week intervention period (p > 0.05). However, significant improvements were observed within each group across all measured outcomes, including reductions in pain intensity and increases in cervical range of motion and chest expansion (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The study confirms that both passive stretching exercises and thoracic spine mobilization are beneficial interventions for enhancing physical outcomes in patients with mechanical nonspecific neck pain. These approaches are equally effective in improving overall physical functionality, underscoring their value in therapeutic settings for neck pain management.

Pedagogy of Physical Culture and SportsVol. 28(4)
Suez Canal University (EG), Cairo University (EG), Nahda University (EG), Sphinx (Netherlands) (NL), Sphinx University (EG), Ahram Canadian University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.