Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use

This study quantitatively examined factors related to young men who have sex with men (YMSM)'s decisions to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by their history of PrEP use and qualitatively elicited their perspectives on PrEP options. Higher proportions of YMSM who had never used (vs. ever used) PrEP considered the following factors as important in their decisions to use PrEP: (a) Returning to PrEP follow-up visits ( p = .02), (b) having to talk about sex/PrEP with providers ( p = .013), (c) people assuming they are infected with HIV ( p = .021), (d) family finding out about their PrEP use ( p = .001), and (e) friends finding out about their PrEP use ( p = .008). Through inductive content analysis, qualitative data showed that a higher proportion of YMSM who had never used PrEP (vs. ever used) expressed concerns about HIV stigma from nonaffirming health care providers and the potential risk of inadvertently revealing their LGBTQ+ identity to others, which were described as potential barriers to PrEP use. Overall, our findings suggest that future interventions may consider tailoring PrEP messaging to YMSM's history of PrEP use, which may ultimately increase PrEP uptake and adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jnc.0000000000000489
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use

Kimberly A. Powers, Matthew T Rosso, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Sybil Hosek et al.
Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use

Kimberly A. Powers, Matthew T Rosso, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Sybil Hosek, Keith J. Horvath, Junye Ma, Jacob B Stocks, Zach Soberano, Bryce F. Stamp
article en

Abstract

This study quantitatively examined factors related to young men who have sex with men (YMSM)'s decisions to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by their history of PrEP use and qualitatively elicited their perspectives on PrEP options. Higher proportions of YMSM who had never used (vs. ever used) PrEP considered the following factors as important in their decisions to use PrEP: (a) Returning to PrEP follow-up visits ( p = .02), (b) having to talk about sex/PrEP with providers ( p = .013), (c) people assuming they are infected with HIV ( p = .021), (d) family finding out about their PrEP use ( p = .001), and (e) friends finding out about their PrEP use ( p = .008). Through inductive content analysis, qualitative data showed that a higher proportion of YMSM who had never used PrEP (vs. ever used) expressed concerns about HIV stigma from nonaffirming health care providers and the potential risk of inadvertently revealing their LGBTQ+ identity to others, which were described as potential barriers to PrEP use. Overall, our findings suggest that future interventions may consider tailoring PrEP messaging to YMSM's history of PrEP use, which may ultimately increase PrEP uptake and adherence.

Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS CareVol. 35(6)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.