Effects of germplasm exchange strategies on genetic gain, homozygosity, and genetic diversity in dairy stud populations: A simulation study

Although genomic selection has led to considerable improvements in genetic gain, it has also seemingly led to increased rates of inbreeding and homozygosity, which can negatively affect genetic diversity and the long-term sustainability of dairy populations. Using genotypes from US Holstein animals from 3 distinct stud populations, we performed a simulation study consisting of 10 rounds of selection, with each breeding population composed of 200 males and 2,000 females. The investigated selection strategies consisted of selection using true breeding values, EBV, EBV penalized for the average future genomic inbreeding of progeny (PEN-EBV), or random selection (RAND). We also simulated several germplasm exchange strategies where germplasm of males from other populations was used for breeding. These strategies included exchanging males based on EBV, PEN-EBV, or low genomic future inbreeding value (GFI) of progeny, or randomly (RAND). Variations of several parameters, such as the correlation between the selection objectives of populations and the size of the exchange, were simulated. Penalizing genetic merit to minimize genomic inbreeding of progeny provided similar genetic gain and reduced the average homozygosity of populations compared with the EBV strategy. Germplasm exchange was found to generally provide long-term benefits to all stud populations. In both the short and the long term, germplasm exchange using the EBV or PEN-EBV strategies provided more cumulative genetic progress than the no-exchange strategy; the amount of long-term genetic progress achieved with germplasm exchange using these strategies was higher for scenarios with a higher genetic correlation between the traits selected by the studs and for a larger size of the exchange. Both the PEN-EBV and GFI exchange strategies allowed decreases in homozygosity and provided significant benefits to genetic diversity compared with other strategies, including larger average minor allele frequencies and smaller proportions of markers near fixation. Overall, this study showed the value of breeding strategies to balance genetic progress and genetic diversity and the benefits of cooperation between studs to ensure the sustainability of their respective breeding programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-24992
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of germplasm exchange strategies on genetic gain, homozygosity, and genetic diversity in dairy stud populations: A simulation study

John B. Cole, P.M. VanRaden, Emmanuel A. Lozada‐Soto, Christian Maltecca et al.
4 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
2.20
article

Effects of germplasm exchange strategies on genetic gain, homozygosity, and genetic diversity in dairy stud populations: A simulation study

John B. Cole, P.M. VanRaden, Emmanuel A. Lozada‐Soto, Christian Maltecca, Jicai Jiang, Francesco Tiezzi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Although genomic selection has led to considerable improvements in genetic gain, it has also seemingly led to increased rates of inbreeding and homozygosity, which can negatively affect genetic diversity and the long-term sustainability of dairy populations. Using genotypes from US Holstein animals from 3 distinct stud populations, we performed a simulation study consisting of 10 rounds of selection, with each breeding population composed of 200 males and 2,000 females. The investigated selection strategies consisted of selection using true breeding values, EBV, EBV penalized for the average future genomic inbreeding of progeny (PEN-EBV), or random selection (RAND). We also simulated several germplasm exchange strategies where germplasm of males from other populations was used for breeding. These strategies included exchanging males based on EBV, PEN-EBV, or low genomic future inbreeding value (GFI) of progeny, or randomly (RAND). Variations of several parameters, such as the correlation between the selection objectives of populations and the size of the exchange, were simulated. Penalizing genetic merit to minimize genomic inbreeding of progeny provided similar genetic gain and reduced the average homozygosity of populations compared with the EBV strategy. Germplasm exchange was found to generally provide long-term benefits to all stud populations. In both the short and the long term, germplasm exchange using the EBV or PEN-EBV strategies provided more cumulative genetic progress than the no-exchange strategy; the amount of long-term genetic progress achieved with germplasm exchange using these strategies was higher for scenarios with a higher genetic correlation between the traits selected by the studs and for a larger size of the exchange. Both the PEN-EBV and GFI exchange strategies allowed decreases in homozygosity and provided significant benefits to genetic diversity compared with other strategies, including larger average minor allele frequencies and smaller proportions of markers near fixation. Overall, this study showed the value of breeding strategies to balance genetic progress and genetic diversity and the benefits of cooperation between studs to ensure the sustainability of their respective breeding programs.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 107(12)
Agricultural Research Service (US), North Carolina State University (US), Madison Group (United States) (US), Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (US), University of Florence (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
2.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.