Design Thinking: Experimental Evidence of Ideation Strategies That Support Team Innovation

Organizations and universities use Design Thinking (DT) to facilitate team innovation. However, few empirical DT studies have quantified it. Across two experiments, each based on semester-long DT projects to generate innovative solutions to sustainability problems, several different DT strategies were compared. Experiment 1 ( n = 145) compared team performance using a DT-Baseline process to a DT-Expanded process. Results showed that teams in DT-Expanded condition using resource constraint and “Yes and” prompts generated 64% more ideas overall than the DT-Baseline condition, but not more original ideas. Experiment 2 ( n = 140) found that teams using the DT-Reverse Ideas strategy (adding a lateral thinking prompt) generated similar numbers of ideas overall, however, these teams generated 2x more original ideas than the DT-Expanded teams. This is one of the first large-scale, semester-long DT experiments measuring performance and suggests that small DT adjustments have potentially large effects on innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260298
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Thinking: Experimental Evidence of Ideation Strategies That Support Team Innovation

Elizabeth S. Veinott, Lisa M. Casper, Molly Helminen
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Design Education and Practice
article

Design Thinking: Experimental Evidence of Ideation Strategies That Support Team Innovation

Elizabeth S. Veinott, Lisa M. Casper, Molly Helminen
article en

Abstract

Organizations and universities use Design Thinking (DT) to facilitate team innovation. However, few empirical DT studies have quantified it. Across two experiments, each based on semester-long DT projects to generate innovative solutions to sustainability problems, several different DT strategies were compared. Experiment 1 ( n = 145) compared team performance using a DT-Baseline process to a DT-Expanded process. Results showed that teams in DT-Expanded condition using resource constraint and “Yes and” prompts generated 64% more ideas overall than the DT-Baseline condition, but not more original ideas. Experiment 2 ( n = 140) found that teams using the DT-Reverse Ideas strategy (adding a lateral thinking prompt) generated similar numbers of ideas overall, however, these teams generated 2x more original ideas than the DT-Expanded teams. This is one of the first large-scale, semester-long DT experiments measuring performance and suggests that small DT adjustments have potentially large effects on innovation.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Michigan Technological University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Design Thinking: Experimental Evidence of Ideation Strategies That Support Team Innovation — Elizabeth S. Veinott, Lisa M. Casper, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS