Quantitative Analysis of Eye-gaze Metrics in Differentiating Surgical Expertise

Eye-tracking plays a crucial role in understanding visual information processing and provides insights into cognitive behaviors. In medicine, gaze patterns help evaluate surgical expertise and training, revealing differences in cognitive workload and visual attention between experts and novices. However, these studies often rely on small sample sizes, limiting generalizability. This necessitates qualitative and quantitative methods to interpret the collective findings in the literature. While the literature contains selective or systematic reviews offering qualitative interpretations, meta-analyses is lacking. This study presents a meta analysis of eye-gaze metrics for assessing surgical expertise, focusing on fixation, and saccade related measures. Fixation frequency and duration, saccade length, and dwell time showed significant differences between expertise, but other metrics did not. Differences in task characteristics are attributed to the different results across measures. Variations in task characteristics explain these differences. advancing understanding of visual attention in medical professionals and informing training and assessment methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241264200
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Analysis of Eye-gaze Metrics in Differentiating Surgical Expertise

Nathan Ka Ching Lau, Jin‐Woo Oh
5 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Radiology practices and education
2.02
article

Quantitative Analysis of Eye-gaze Metrics in Differentiating Surgical Expertise

Nathan Ka Ching Lau, Jin‐Woo Oh
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Eye-tracking plays a crucial role in understanding visual information processing and provides insights into cognitive behaviors. In medicine, gaze patterns help evaluate surgical expertise and training, revealing differences in cognitive workload and visual attention between experts and novices. However, these studies often rely on small sample sizes, limiting generalizability. This necessitates qualitative and quantitative methods to interpret the collective findings in the literature. While the literature contains selective or systematic reviews offering qualitative interpretations, meta-analyses is lacking. This study presents a meta analysis of eye-gaze metrics for assessing surgical expertise, focusing on fixation, and saccade related measures. Fixation frequency and duration, saccade length, and dwell time showed significant differences between expertise, but other metrics did not. Differences in task characteristics are attributed to the different results across measures. Variations in task characteristics explain these differences. advancing understanding of visual attention in medical professionals and informing training and assessment methodologies.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Virginia Tech (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiology practices and education
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Analysis of Eye-gaze Metrics in Differentiating Surgical Expertise — Nathan Ka Ching Lau, Jin‐Woo Oh · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS