What makes paradigms last? A study of defense policy change in Germany and Italy (1989–2022)

Policy ideas are often crafted in international fora, such as international organisations, multilateral institutions, and high-level summits. However, whether and how ideas will eventually inform policymakers at the domestic level remains an understudied subject. This paper contributes to this debate by tracing the domestic consolidation and eventual erosion of 'Crisis Management', a policy paradigm that emerged after the end of the Cold War and became dominant among NATO members in the 2010s. We investigate Germany and Italy as two case studies that followed two distinct trajectories. Policy elites suddenly adopted the paradigm in Italy and built a broad consensus on it. In Germany, crisis management has emerged lately and remains contested, as the territorial defense has maintained legitimacy among elites. Understanding the mechanisms underpinning such trajectories is the key to uncovering whether a consensus on a new version of territorial defense as a dominant paradigm will consolidate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2397134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What makes paradigms last? A study of defense policy change in Germany and Italy (1989–2022)

Marco Di Giulio, Fabrizio Coticchia
1 citations
Journal of European Public Policy
European Union Policy and Governance
2.23
article

What makes paradigms last? A study of defense policy change in Germany and Italy (1989–2022)

Marco Di Giulio, Fabrizio Coticchia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Policy ideas are often crafted in international fora, such as international organisations, multilateral institutions, and high-level summits. However, whether and how ideas will eventually inform policymakers at the domestic level remains an understudied subject. This paper contributes to this debate by tracing the domestic consolidation and eventual erosion of 'Crisis Management', a policy paradigm that emerged after the end of the Cold War and became dominant among NATO members in the 2010s. We investigate Germany and Italy as two case studies that followed two distinct trajectories. Policy elites suddenly adopted the paradigm in Italy and built a broad consensus on it. In Germany, crisis management has emerged lately and remains contested, as the territorial defense has maintained legitimacy among elites. Understanding the mechanisms underpinning such trajectories is the key to uncovering whether a consensus on a new version of territorial defense as a dominant paradigm will consolidate.

Journal of European Public PolicyVol. 32(7)
University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
European Union Policy and Governance
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What makes paradigms last? A study of defense policy change in Germany and Italy (1989–2022) — Marco Di Giulio, Fabrizio Coticchia · Journal of European Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS