Thematic Analysis of Interviews With U.S. Space Force Guardians on Multi-Agent System Teams in Space

A vision for the future of space exploration and operation is one in which people live and work in space as members of human–multi-agent teams, comprised of humans, robots, and other artificially intelligent agents. As such, people’s opinions on robotics and AI, especially the opinions of those who will likely be users of such systems, should be taken into account for system requirements, design, and implementation. This work analyzes interviews conducted with U.S. Space Force (USSF) Guardians to ascertain these opinions. Overall, USSF Guardians expressed an understanding of the limitations and benefits of what humans have to offer versus what AI and robotic systems do, such as differences in emotional variability and decision making abilities. Also discussed is the desire for limitations to be placed on these types of systems so that humans are always involved in certain tasks. And finally, USSF Guardians described what aspects of their work they believe could benefit from a robotic AI system. These themes could be translated into concrete design features, such as task allocation, of multi-agent systems that are not only successful, but desirable for users to work with.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241277526
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thematic Analysis of Interviews With U.S. Space Force Guardians on Multi-Agent System Teams in Space

Chad C. Tossell, Ewart J. de Visser, Samantha Miles, Lydia Melles et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Thematic Analysis of Interviews With U.S. Space Force Guardians on Multi-Agent System Teams in Space

Chad C. Tossell, Ewart J. de Visser, Samantha Miles, Lydia Melles, Elizabeth Phillips, Richard E. Niemeyer, Sara Scrapchansky, Kiara Morales
article en

Abstract

A vision for the future of space exploration and operation is one in which people live and work in space as members of human–multi-agent teams, comprised of humans, robots, and other artificially intelligent agents. As such, people’s opinions on robotics and AI, especially the opinions of those who will likely be users of such systems, should be taken into account for system requirements, design, and implementation. This work analyzes interviews conducted with U.S. Space Force (USSF) Guardians to ascertain these opinions. Overall, USSF Guardians expressed an understanding of the limitations and benefits of what humans have to offer versus what AI and robotic systems do, such as differences in emotional variability and decision making abilities. Also discussed is the desire for limitations to be placed on these types of systems so that humans are always involved in certain tasks. And finally, USSF Guardians described what aspects of their work they believe could benefit from a robotic AI system. These themes could be translated into concrete design features, such as task allocation, of multi-agent systems that are not only successful, but desirable for users to work with.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
George Mason University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), United States Air Force Academy (US)
George Mason University, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.