Analyzing Human-Automation Interdependence Based on the Situational Property and Task Timescale

Automation’s imperfection requires driver engagement to handle challenging tasks, creating interdependent relationships where both parties influence each other. Therefore, it is vital to support driver-automation interdependence to align their behaviors with team goals. We expand the Interdependence Analysis (IA) method to evaluate interdependent relationships within driver-automation teams, considering their situational property (e.g., cost of task failure) and the timescale of team tasks. We used the proposed IA to assess the interdependence between a driver and the Tesla Model Y when its Automatic Lane Change feature is engaged. The proposed IA revealed that trajectory planning for lane-changing is performed without driver involvement despite the task’s high cost of failure. Timescale decomposition suggested that trajectory planning relies on short-term road user movement and lane predictions, identifying the specific task and timescale to be supported. This study demonstrates the benefits of considering situational property and task timescale in analyzing interdependence within driver-automation teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275930
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Human-Automation Interdependence Based on the Situational Property and Task Timescale

John D. Lee, Hansol Rheem, Joonbum Lee, Joshua Domeyer
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Analyzing Human-Automation Interdependence Based on the Situational Property and Task Timescale

John D. Lee, Hansol Rheem, Joonbum Lee, Joshua Domeyer
article en

Abstract

Automation’s imperfection requires driver engagement to handle challenging tasks, creating interdependent relationships where both parties influence each other. Therefore, it is vital to support driver-automation interdependence to align their behaviors with team goals. We expand the Interdependence Analysis (IA) method to evaluate interdependent relationships within driver-automation teams, considering their situational property (e.g., cost of task failure) and the timescale of team tasks. We used the proposed IA to assess the interdependence between a driver and the Tesla Model Y when its Automatic Lane Change feature is engaged. The proposed IA revealed that trajectory planning for lane-changing is performed without driver involvement despite the task’s high cost of failure. Timescale decomposition suggested that trajectory planning relies on short-term road user movement and lane predictions, identifying the specific task and timescale to be supported. This study demonstrates the benefits of considering situational property and task timescale in analyzing interdependence within driver-automation teams.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing Human-Automation Interdependence Based on the Situational Property and Task Timescale — John D. Lee, Hansol Rheem, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS