Hunting from Elevated Tree Stands: Hunters’ Safety Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Personal Fall Arrest Systems - Update

This study sought to identify hunters’ attitudes and practices with respect to the use of personal fall arrest systems (PFAS) when hunting from elevated (tree) stands. Hunting is a popular recreational activity in the United States (US) and the use of elevated stands (e.g., tree stands) provides hunters with several advantages in hunting large game animals, such as deer. However, hunting from an elevated position creates a hazard and the potential for serious injury or death should the hunter fall while climbing into or out of the stand or while positioned in the stand. Hunters were surveyed regarding their hunting practices, their attitudes regarding the use of Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS) when hunting with elevated stands, reasons why they do not use a PFAS when hunting with an elevated stand, and their prior experience with falls from elevated hunting stands. Although the results varied based upon the hunter’s activity with the stand, a majority of the hunters surveyed reported not always using PFAS and that a significant percentage of hunters never use a PFAS when hunting from an elevated stand. Respondents reported several reasons for not always using a PFAS, including: time, cumbersome, hinders movement, do not think about it, and difficult to use. Discussion of the results as they relate to an earlier survey and well as approaches to increase compliance of using a PFAS will be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260741
Primary Topic
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hunting from Elevated Tree Stands: Hunters’ Safety Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Personal Fall Arrest Systems - Update

William J. Vigilante, Raymond Lim
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
article

Hunting from Elevated Tree Stands: Hunters’ Safety Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Personal Fall Arrest Systems - Update

William J. Vigilante, Raymond Lim
article en

Abstract

This study sought to identify hunters’ attitudes and practices with respect to the use of personal fall arrest systems (PFAS) when hunting from elevated (tree) stands. Hunting is a popular recreational activity in the United States (US) and the use of elevated stands (e.g., tree stands) provides hunters with several advantages in hunting large game animals, such as deer. However, hunting from an elevated position creates a hazard and the potential for serious injury or death should the hunter fall while climbing into or out of the stand or while positioned in the stand. Hunters were surveyed regarding their hunting practices, their attitudes regarding the use of Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS) when hunting with elevated stands, reasons why they do not use a PFAS when hunting with an elevated stand, and their prior experience with falls from elevated hunting stands. Although the results varied based upon the hunter’s activity with the stand, a majority of the hunters surveyed reported not always using PFAS and that a significant percentage of hunters never use a PFAS when hunting from an elevated stand. Respondents reported several reasons for not always using a PFAS, including: time, cumbersome, hinders movement, do not think about it, and difficult to use. Discussion of the results as they relate to an earlier survey and well as approaches to increase compliance of using a PFAS will be discussed.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Los Angeles Pierce College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.