Assessing Driver’s Trust, Compliance, and Reliance in an Automated Flood Warning System: Effects of Error Types and System Reliability

The increasing threat of inland flooding due to precipitation changes and floodplain development necessitates efficient real-time flood detection and communication methods. While automated floodwarning systems facilitate such communication, they are susceptible to errors like false alarms and misses, which could undermine drivers’ trust during flood events. This study examined how system accuracy and error type impact perceived system reliability, as well as drivers’ trust and behaviors. Our results showed that both false alarms and misses lowered drivers’ perceived system reliability, and drivers were more inclined to follow recommendations from a system with higher reliability compared to one with low reliability. Misses and false alarms influenced drivers’ reliance and compliance behaviors differently. These findings help predict how system reliability level and error type shape drivers’ responses to automated flood-warning systems, potentially contributing to their design and calibration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241276493
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Driver’s Trust, Compliance, and Reliance in an Automated Flood Warning System: Effects of Error Types and System Reliability

Katherine R. Garcia, Jing Chen, Tianyi Mao
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Assessing Driver’s Trust, Compliance, and Reliance in an Automated Flood Warning System: Effects of Error Types and System Reliability

Katherine R. Garcia, Jing Chen, Tianyi Mao
article en

Abstract

The increasing threat of inland flooding due to precipitation changes and floodplain development necessitates efficient real-time flood detection and communication methods. While automated floodwarning systems facilitate such communication, they are susceptible to errors like false alarms and misses, which could undermine drivers’ trust during flood events. This study examined how system accuracy and error type impact perceived system reliability, as well as drivers’ trust and behaviors. Our results showed that both false alarms and misses lowered drivers’ perceived system reliability, and drivers were more inclined to follow recommendations from a system with higher reliability compared to one with low reliability. Misses and false alarms influenced drivers’ reliance and compliance behaviors differently. These findings help predict how system reliability level and error type shape drivers’ responses to automated flood-warning systems, potentially contributing to their design and calibration.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Rice University (US)
National Science Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Driver’s Trust, Compliance, and Reliance in an Automated Flood Warning System: Effects of Error Types and System Reliability — Katherine R. Garcia, Jing Chen, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS