Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self-reported to objective measures

The majority of AI literacy studies have designed and developed self-reported questionnaires to assess AI learning and understanding. These studies assessed students' perceived AI capability rather than AI literacy because self-perceptions are seldom an accurate account of true measures. International assessment programs that use objective measures to assess science, mathematical, digital, and computational literacy back up this argument. Furthermore, because AI education research is still in its infancy, the current definition of AI literacy in the literature may not meet the needs of young students. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate an AI literacy test for school students within the interdisciplinary project known as AI4future. Engineering and education researchers created and selected 25 multiple-choice questions to accomplish this goal, and school teachers validated them while developing an AI curriculum for middle schools. 2390 students in grades 7 to 9 took the test. We used a Rasch model to investigate the discrimination, reliability, and validity of the items. The results showed that the model met the unidimensionality assumption and demonstrated a set of reliable and valid items. They indicate the quality of the test items. The test enables AI education researchers and practitioners to appropriately evaluate their AI-related education interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100282
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self-reported to objective measures

Savio W.H. Wong, Helen Meng, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Ching Sing Chai et al.
26 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Teaching and Learning Programming
10.71
article

Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self-reported to objective measures

Savio W.H. Wong, Helen Meng, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Ching Sing Chai, King Woon Yau, Irwin King, Yeung Yam, Yifan Chen
article en
26 citations

Abstract

The majority of AI literacy studies have designed and developed self-reported questionnaires to assess AI learning and understanding. These studies assessed students' perceived AI capability rather than AI literacy because self-perceptions are seldom an accurate account of true measures. International assessment programs that use objective measures to assess science, mathematical, digital, and computational literacy back up this argument. Furthermore, because AI education research is still in its infancy, the current definition of AI literacy in the literature may not meet the needs of young students. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate an AI literacy test for school students within the interdisciplinary project known as AI4future. Engineering and education researchers created and selected 25 multiple-choice questions to accomplish this goal, and school teachers validated them while developing an AI curriculum for middle schools. 2390 students in grades 7 to 9 took the test. We used a Rasch model to investigate the discrimination, reliability, and validity of the items. The results showed that the model met the unidimensionality assumption and demonstrated a set of reliable and valid items. They indicate the quality of the test items. The test enables AI education researchers and practitioners to appropriately evaluate their AI-related education interventions.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Teaching and Learning Programming
10.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.