Assessing Clinician Experience: Contributions from Human Factors

Evidence points to the critical importance of creating a positive clinical experience to maintain a well-functioning healthcare system. Despite its importance, there is little guidance on how to assess clinical user experience. While there does not yet appear to be consensus on critical domains of clinical experience, most components that appear in the literature or as categories in proprietary descriptions include areas in which human factors can and should have an impact. Panelists will discuss their experiences with various approaches to assessing clinical user experience and associated advantages and disadvantages. Specific approaches discussed include how technical and system data can be triangulated with other data, use of MITRE’s Resilience-Aware Development structured observation form (RAD-O), application of various survey strategies, and application of a work-centered approach to evaluation. A clinician also brings the perspective of the impact of using multiple electronic health records simultaneously on user experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241276461
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Clinician Experience: Contributions from Human Factors

Kelly Neville, Emilie M. Roth, Jennifer Herout, Kyle Maddox et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
0.85
article

Assessing Clinician Experience: Contributions from Human Factors

Kelly Neville, Emilie M. Roth, Jennifer Herout, Kyle Maddox, Shawna J. Perry, Emily S. Patterson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence points to the critical importance of creating a positive clinical experience to maintain a well-functioning healthcare system. Despite its importance, there is little guidance on how to assess clinical user experience. While there does not yet appear to be consensus on critical domains of clinical experience, most components that appear in the literature or as categories in proprietary descriptions include areas in which human factors can and should have an impact. Panelists will discuss their experiences with various approaches to assessing clinical user experience and associated advantages and disadvantages. Specific approaches discussed include how technical and system data can be triangulated with other data, use of MITRE’s Resilience-Aware Development structured observation form (RAD-O), application of various survey strategies, and application of a work-centered approach to evaluation. A clinician also brings the perspective of the impact of using multiple electronic health records simultaneously on user experience.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), University of Florida (US), Jacksonville University (US), Mitre (United States) (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.