Optimal runner design for balanced filling in a multi‐cavity mold using a two‐stage analytical approach

Abstract In a multi‐cavity mold, parts from each cavity have consistent properties if the runner system ensures balanced melt‐front advancement. An unbalanced mold, however, narrows the processing window, complicating quality control and making it harder to maintain standards. Molds with an inherently balanced filling, such as the H‐type runner system, are preferred. However, as the number of cavities increases, improvements are needed to address the issues caused by shear heating. Additionally, the material waste in the H‐type runner system is significantly greater than in the fishbone runner system. Based on the rheological concept, a two‐stage analytical approach is established to optimize the fishbone runner system. The diameter of each runner in the fishbone runner system is optimized by controlling pressure drop and remaining time to achieve balanced filling. The impact of these factors is thoroughly examined, as well as why they must be controlled during optimization. The proposed work links the physical situation to its mathematical model, proving highly beneficial for new runner system designs, especially without commercial software assistance. Highlights A new approach to solving unbalanced filling in multi‐cavity molds. Pressure drop and remaining time are key factors for optimization. Two‐stage analytical approach ensures optimization accuracy. The optimal runner system reduces injection pressure for molding. An alternative method for designing fishbone runners without CAE assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Engineering and Science
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26945
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Injection Molding Process and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal runner design for balanced filling in a multi‐cavity mold using a two‐stage analytical approach

Bo‐Yu Yang, Chung‐Chih Lin
2 citations
Polymer Engineering and Science
Injection Molding Process and Properties
0.43
article

Optimal runner design for balanced filling in a multi‐cavity mold using a two‐stage analytical approach

Bo‐Yu Yang, Chung‐Chih Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In a multi‐cavity mold, parts from each cavity have consistent properties if the runner system ensures balanced melt‐front advancement. An unbalanced mold, however, narrows the processing window, complicating quality control and making it harder to maintain standards. Molds with an inherently balanced filling, such as the H‐type runner system, are preferred. However, as the number of cavities increases, improvements are needed to address the issues caused by shear heating. Additionally, the material waste in the H‐type runner system is significantly greater than in the fishbone runner system. Based on the rheological concept, a two‐stage analytical approach is established to optimize the fishbone runner system. The diameter of each runner in the fishbone runner system is optimized by controlling pressure drop and remaining time to achieve balanced filling. The impact of these factors is thoroughly examined, as well as why they must be controlled during optimization. The proposed work links the physical situation to its mathematical model, proving highly beneficial for new runner system designs, especially without commercial software assistance. Highlights A new approach to solving unbalanced filling in multi‐cavity molds. Pressure drop and remaining time are key factors for optimization. Two‐stage analytical approach ensures optimization accuracy. The optimal runner system reduces injection pressure for molding. An alternative method for designing fishbone runners without CAE assistance.

Polymer Engineering and ScienceVol. 64(11)
National Formosa University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Injection Molding Process and Properties
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.