Considerations for Developing Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support: Preventing Older Adult Falls after Emergency Department Visits

To support the ongoing adaptation and implementation of an Emergency Department (ED)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool to prevent future falls, we interviewed older adults (n=15) during their ED stay. We elicited their feedback on the written and verbal content of the existing CDS, feelings about the automated risk-screening aspect of the CDS and asked them to identify barriers that would prevent them from following up with the Falls Clinic to which the CDS supports referral placements. Our findings suggest that the older adults interviewed saw the CDS simply as another tool that they trusted their ED physician/APP to interact with. The identified barriers to follow-up reflect common access barriers such as transportation availability and clinic distance. For CDS tools to impact real-life patient outcomes, we must consider patient's needs and limitations and appropriately match interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275504
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for Developing Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support: Preventing Older Adult Falls after Emergency Department Visits

Manish N. Shah, Brian W. Patterson, Olivia M. Lin, Apoorva Maru et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
0.69
article

Considerations for Developing Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support: Preventing Older Adult Falls after Emergency Department Visits

Manish N. Shah, Brian W. Patterson, Olivia M. Lin, Apoorva Maru, Daniel J Hekman, Margaret Leaf, Hanna J. Barton, Douglas A. Wiegmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To support the ongoing adaptation and implementation of an Emergency Department (ED)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool to prevent future falls, we interviewed older adults (n=15) during their ED stay. We elicited their feedback on the written and verbal content of the existing CDS, feelings about the automated risk-screening aspect of the CDS and asked them to identify barriers that would prevent them from following up with the Falls Clinic to which the CDS supports referral placements. Our findings suggest that the older adults interviewed saw the CDS simply as another tool that they trusted their ED physician/APP to interact with. The identified barriers to follow-up reflect common access barriers such as transportation availability and clinic distance. For CDS tools to impact real-life patient outcomes, we must consider patient's needs and limitations and appropriately match interventions.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considerations for Developing Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support: Preventing Older Adult Falls after Emergency Department Visits — Manish N. Shah, Brian W. Patterson, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS