Evaluating Sustainable Carbon-Neutral Cities Through ESG and SDGs: Based on Copenhagen and Jeju Island

Following the declaration of carbon neutrality by 2050, interest in carbon-neutral cities has surged, although most research primarily focuses on carbon reduction and technological aspects. This study aims to address these limitations by linking ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) goals with SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) and conducting a comparative analysis of Copenhagen (CPH2025) and Jeju Island (CFI2030). Based on previous research, ESG factors were reclassified into technology, legal systems, and living labs, and an evaluation scale was constructed to compare CPH2025 and CFI2030. This study compares the strengths and weaknesses of these successful carbon-neutral city cases, providing valuable insights into sustainable directions for carbon-neutral cities from a new perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Society for Appropriate Technology
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37675/jat.2024.00507
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Sustainable Carbon-Neutral Cities Through ESG and SDGs: Based on Copenhagen and Jeju Island

J. H. LEE, Da-Yeon Lee, Young-Geun Eom, In-Hwan Kim et al.
1 citations
Academic Society for Appropriate Technology
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
0.73
article

Evaluating Sustainable Carbon-Neutral Cities Through ESG and SDGs: Based on Copenhagen and Jeju Island

J. H. LEE, Da-Yeon Lee, Young-Geun Eom, In-Hwan Kim, Byeong-Hun Park
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following the declaration of carbon neutrality by 2050, interest in carbon-neutral cities has surged, although most research primarily focuses on carbon reduction and technological aspects. This study aims to address these limitations by linking ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) goals with SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) and conducting a comparative analysis of Copenhagen (CPH2025) and Jeju Island (CFI2030). Based on previous research, ESG factors were reclassified into technology, legal systems, and living labs, and an evaluation scale was constructed to compare CPH2025 and CFI2030. This study compares the strengths and weaknesses of these successful carbon-neutral city cases, providing valuable insights into sustainable directions for carbon-neutral cities from a new perspective.

Academic Society for Appropriate TechnologyVol. 10(2)
Seoul National University (KR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Sustainable Carbon-Neutral Cities Through ESG and SDGs: Based on Copenhagen and Jeju Island — J. H. LEE, Da-Yeon Lee, et al. · Academic Society for Appropriate Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS