The New EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Impact on the Biodiversity Information Community

In February 2024, the European Union (EU) endorsed the AI Act, launched the new European Artificial Intelligence Office and initiated the program Generative AI for the EU (GenAI4EU, Fig. 1). This legislation governs how AI is developed, deployed and used in Europe. The obligations will incrementally become mandatory until 2030. While the Act was primarily designed to identify and protect humans from risks of manipulation and illicit use of AI, it will not be without impact on the biodiversity community. AI in our domain will mostly be ranked as no-to-low risk (Fig. 2). However, we will have to adhere to the transparency requirements and be particularly attentive when combining AI with citizen science initiatives affecting potentially the general public or for example, if projects concern illegal trafficking of species and border control. A further point of attention with our worldwide scope, is that non-European AI initiatives or tools allowed to be deployed or used in Europe will have to commit to follow both the AI Act and the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and have a reference person or institution with a legal address in Europe. There will be a two-year transition period as of 2026 to adapt to this regulation. EU proposals require filling out an extensive questionnaire as an annex on ethical aspects, which already included the trustworthy usage of AI. This questionnaire is regularly updated, increasing the number of questions and details related to AI following the new EU AI act regulations. While the usage of AI is already evaluated, if present during the review process of proposals selected for funding by the EU, future projects can be audited at any time during their execution period, challenging compliance with both legal and ethical requirements of AI, risking being put on hold or even stopped if they do not comply. The Belgian Association of Research Managers and Administrators of European-funded projects (Be-Arma) provided an online training on compliance with AI & ethics in Horizon Europe. Current discussions at the EU level are on how they can remain competitive in AI, compared to other countries where fewer legal or ethical barriers exist. While judged essential, there are no doubts that such regulations slow down the development and implementation processes, as largely addressed during the conference, Research to Reality: Digital Solutions to European Challenges, held during the Belgian EU Presidency. The balance between open collaboration and free sharing of data and knowledge are challenged by concerns about so called strategic autonomy (European Commission et al. 2024) and competitiveness. These concepts were pushed even further in the EU conference: Research Infrastructures in a Changing Global, Environmental and Socio-economical Context, where the current critical geo-political context was linked to a need for even more strategic autonomy in Europe, where AI and other digital solutions were explicitly mentioned. As an introduction to this session, this talk will go to the best of our knowledge over these new EU AI Act requirements and how it may affect future AI-linked activities in our natural sciences domain, including how they may affect the funding of our information technology activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.8.135924
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The New EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Impact on the Biodiversity Information Community

Patricia Mergen
Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

The New EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Impact on the Biodiversity Information Community

Patricia Mergen
article en

Abstract

In February 2024, the European Union (EU) endorsed the AI Act, launched the new European Artificial Intelligence Office and initiated the program Generative AI for the EU (GenAI4EU, Fig. 1). This legislation governs how AI is developed, deployed and used in Europe. The obligations will incrementally become mandatory until 2030. While the Act was primarily designed to identify and protect humans from risks of manipulation and illicit use of AI, it will not be without impact on the biodiversity community. AI in our domain will mostly be ranked as no-to-low risk (Fig. 2). However, we will have to adhere to the transparency requirements and be particularly attentive when combining AI with citizen science initiatives affecting potentially the general public or for example, if projects concern illegal trafficking of species and border control. A further point of attention with our worldwide scope, is that non-European AI initiatives or tools allowed to be deployed or used in Europe will have to commit to follow both the AI Act and the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and have a reference person or institution with a legal address in Europe. There will be a two-year transition period as of 2026 to adapt to this regulation. EU proposals require filling out an extensive questionnaire as an annex on ethical aspects, which already included the trustworthy usage of AI. This questionnaire is regularly updated, increasing the number of questions and details related to AI following the new EU AI act regulations. While the usage of AI is already evaluated, if present during the review process of proposals selected for funding by the EU, future projects can be audited at any time during their execution period, challenging compliance with both legal and ethical requirements of AI, risking being put on hold or even stopped if they do not comply. The Belgian Association of Research Managers and Administrators of European-funded projects (Be-Arma) provided an online training on compliance with AI & ethics in Horizon Europe. Current discussions at the EU level are on how they can remain competitive in AI, compared to other countries where fewer legal or ethical barriers exist. While judged essential, there are no doubts that such regulations slow down the development and implementation processes, as largely addressed during the conference, Research to Reality: Digital Solutions to European Challenges, held during the Belgian EU Presidency. The balance between open collaboration and free sharing of data and knowledge are challenged by concerns about so called strategic autonomy (European Commission et al. 2024) and competitiveness. These concepts were pushed even further in the EU conference: Research Infrastructures in a Changing Global, Environmental and Socio-economical Context, where the current critical geo-political context was linked to a need for even more strategic autonomy in Europe, where AI and other digital solutions were explicitly mentioned. As an introduction to this session, this talk will go to the best of our knowledge over these new EU AI Act requirements and how it may affect future AI-linked activities in our natural sciences domain, including how they may affect the funding of our information technology activities.

Biodiversity Information Science and StandardsVol. 8
Royal Museum for Central Africa (BE), Meise Botanic Garden (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering, HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.