Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine in ketamine based procedural sedation for pediatric cathlab procedures: A prospective double blinded randomized trial

: The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine as premedication sedative agent for ketamine based deep sedation on hemodynamics, sedation level and need for additional boluses of ketamine, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing various cardiac catheterization procedure. : Sixty pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled in the current study. Patients were randomly distributed to two equal groups of 30 patients each: Group D and Group N. Patients randomized to Group D received a bolus of dexmedetomidine at 1 μg/kg over 10 min and Group N received a bolus of nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg over 10min. In both the groups patients were induced with Inj ketamine 2mg/kg. After induction dose inj ketamine 0.5mg/kg boluses were given to achieve and maintain the target Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS)≥ 4. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2), and sedation scores were recorded. Recovery time, perioperative adverse events, and total ketamine consumption required for anesthesia maintenance were also recorded. : There was significant decreased in HR from baseline in group D at 10, 20, and 30min of the procedure with no significant difference as regards the MAP between the two study groups. Ketamine consumption in group N was significantly lower than in group D to maintain RSS in desired range. The recovery time was significantly shorter in group N when compared with group D. Respiratory variables were maintained in both the groups with two patients reported airway obstruction which was partial. No significant difference was found in intra and postoperative adverse effect between the groups. : The nalbuphine was found to be superior to dexmedetomidine as a premedication sedation for pediatric cathlab procedure in terms of reduced consumption of ketamine for adequate intraoperative sedation to conduct the procedure with better hemodynamic control and the shorter recovery time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.065
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine in ketamine based procedural sedation for pediatric cathlab procedures: A prospective double blinded randomized trial

Anil Kumar Bhiwal, Alka Chhabra, P M Patel, Karuna Sharma et al.
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine in ketamine based procedural sedation for pediatric cathlab procedures: A prospective double blinded randomized trial

Anil Kumar Bhiwal, Alka Chhabra, P M Patel, Karuna Sharma, Pinki Meena
article en

Abstract

: The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine as premedication sedative agent for ketamine based deep sedation on hemodynamics, sedation level and need for additional boluses of ketamine, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing various cardiac catheterization procedure. : Sixty pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled in the current study. Patients were randomly distributed to two equal groups of 30 patients each: Group D and Group N. Patients randomized to Group D received a bolus of dexmedetomidine at 1 μg/kg over 10 min and Group N received a bolus of nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg over 10min. In both the groups patients were induced with Inj ketamine 2mg/kg. After induction dose inj ketamine 0.5mg/kg boluses were given to achieve and maintain the target Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS)≥ 4. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2), and sedation scores were recorded. Recovery time, perioperative adverse events, and total ketamine consumption required for anesthesia maintenance were also recorded. : There was significant decreased in HR from baseline in group D at 10, 20, and 30min of the procedure with no significant difference as regards the MAP between the two study groups. Ketamine consumption in group N was significantly lower than in group D to maintain RSS in desired range. The recovery time was significantly shorter in group N when compared with group D. Respiratory variables were maintained in both the groups with two patients reported airway obstruction which was partial. No significant difference was found in intra and postoperative adverse effect between the groups. : The nalbuphine was found to be superior to dexmedetomidine as a premedication sedation for pediatric cathlab procedure in terms of reduced consumption of ketamine for adequate intraoperative sedation to conduct the procedure with better hemodynamic control and the shorter recovery time.

Indian Journal of Clinical AnaesthesiaVol. 11(3)
Rabindranath Tagore Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.