A Comparative Study: Attitudes and Thinking Patterns Students in Citizenship Education

Purpose of the study: This study aims to explain the differences in attitudes and mindsets of grade XI students majoring in social sciences and grade XI students majoring in natural sciences in the subject of citizenship education. Methodology: The method used in this study is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach and data collection techniques using attitude scales and rubrics. The population in this study were students of grade XI majoring in social sciences and grade XI majoring in natural sciences at State Senior High School 1 Seputih Banyak, Central Lampung Regency, totaling 254 students with a sample taken as much as 20% of the population, namely 51 respondents. Main Findings: The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference between attitudes and mindsets with an average of 848 and 194.36 for grade XI students majoring in social sciences, while 868.67 and 219.99 for grade XI students majoring in natural sciences in the subject of citizenship education. This shows that grade XI students majoring in natural sciences have better attitudes and mindsets than grade XI students majoring in social sciences. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is the disclosure of significant differences in attitudes and mindsets between grade XI social science majors and grade XI natural science majors in the citizenship education subject, which provides new insights into how academic background influences their perceptions and approaches to citizenship education learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v5i3.1072
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study: Attitudes and Thinking Patterns Students in Citizenship Education

Ana Mickovska-Raleva, Jobila Mohammed Zakari, Karfad Mardiana
3 citations
Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)
Education and Character Development
6.29
article

A Comparative Study: Attitudes and Thinking Patterns Students in Citizenship Education

Ana Mickovska-Raleva, Jobila Mohammed Zakari, Karfad Mardiana
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to explain the differences in attitudes and mindsets of grade XI students majoring in social sciences and grade XI students majoring in natural sciences in the subject of citizenship education. Methodology: The method used in this study is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach and data collection techniques using attitude scales and rubrics. The population in this study were students of grade XI majoring in social sciences and grade XI majoring in natural sciences at State Senior High School 1 Seputih Banyak, Central Lampung Regency, totaling 254 students with a sample taken as much as 20% of the population, namely 51 respondents. Main Findings: The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference between attitudes and mindsets with an average of 848 and 194.36 for grade XI students majoring in social sciences, while 868.67 and 219.99 for grade XI students majoring in natural sciences in the subject of citizenship education. This shows that grade XI students majoring in natural sciences have better attitudes and mindsets than grade XI students majoring in social sciences. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is the disclosure of significant differences in attitudes and mindsets between grade XI social science majors and grade XI natural science majors in the citizenship education subject, which provides new insights into how academic background influences their perceptions and approaches to citizenship education learning.

Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)Vol. 5(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Character Development
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.