A cross‐sectional survey investigating challenges in lameness identification among equine owners

Background: To improve detection of equine back-related disorders, it is important to establish how movement dynamics in horses' thoracolumbo-sacral spine are normally affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors.Objective: To quantify how discipline, activity, gait and surface impact rotational upper-body movement in horses from the military and police forces.Study design: Cross-sectional.Methods: 106 owner-sound horses were walked and trotted in-hand in a straight-line at walk and trot over hard and soft surfaces.During exercises, inertial sensors (XSens MTw) were mounted with doublesided tape to the poll, withers, thoracic vertebrae-13 (T13) and 18 (T18), lumbar vertebra-3 (L3), sacrum (between tubera sacrale) and caudal sacrum.Linear mixed models assessed whether horse discipline (load pulling or non-load pulling), activity level (active or retired), gait (walk or trot) or surface (soft or hard) influenced rotational differences among adjacent sensors (significance at p < 0.05).Results: Horses used for pulling loads had significantly reduced axialrotation between withers-T13 and T13-T18, by 2.3-2.6 , and reduced flexion-extension at poll-withers and T13-T18, by 1.3-1.5 (p 0.009).Active horses showed instances of reduced axial-rotation (at T18-L3, L3-sacrum, sacrum-caudal-sacrum, p 0.002, 2.7-3.8 ), flexionextension (T18-L3, L3-sacrum, p 0.006, 0.8-0.9 ) and lateral-bending (withers-T13, sacrum-caudal-sacrum, p 0.002, 1.0-2.0 ), but also had increased axial-rotation at withers-T13 (p = 0.02, 1.7 ) and increased flexion-extension at poll-withers (p < 0.001, 2.7 ). Trotting increased axial-rotation at all sites by 1.9-7.6 (p < 0.001), except poll-withers, but reduced lateral-bending at all sites by 0.4-8.3(p < 0.001), except L3-sacrum.Soft surfaces increased rotational range of movements, by 0.2-2.4 , in the 12/18 significant surface comparisons (p 0.03).Main limitations: Walk and trot speeds varied.Conclusions: These data will help to develop an equine back dynamics reference framework, to which individuals may be compared.Further work will explore these data in the context of horse movement asymmetry, age, stride duration, breed and objective surface properties.

Publication Details

Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14194
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross‐sectional survey investigating challenges in lameness identification among equine owners

1 citations
Equine Veterinary Journal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
0.64
article

A cross‐sectional survey investigating challenges in lameness identification among equine owners

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: To improve detection of equine back-related disorders, it is important to establish how movement dynamics in horses' thoracolumbo-sacral spine are normally affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors.Objective: To quantify how discipline, activity, gait and surface impact rotational upper-body movement in horses from the military and police forces.Study design: Cross-sectional.Methods: 106 owner-sound horses were walked and trotted in-hand in a straight-line at walk and trot over hard and soft surfaces.During exercises, inertial sensors (XSens MTw) were mounted with doublesided tape to the poll, withers, thoracic vertebrae-13 (T13) and 18 (T18), lumbar vertebra-3 (L3), sacrum (between tubera sacrale) and caudal sacrum.Linear mixed models assessed whether horse discipline (load pulling or non-load pulling), activity level (active or retired), gait (walk or trot) or surface (soft or hard) influenced rotational differences among adjacent sensors (significance at p < 0.05).Results: Horses used for pulling loads had significantly reduced axialrotation between withers-T13 and T13-T18, by 2.3-2.6 , and reduced flexion-extension at poll-withers and T13-T18, by 1.3-1.5 (p 0.009).Active horses showed instances of reduced axial-rotation (at T18-L3, L3-sacrum, sacrum-caudal-sacrum, p 0.002, 2.7-3.8 ), flexionextension (T18-L3, L3-sacrum, p 0.006, 0.8-0.9 ) and lateral-bending (withers-T13, sacrum-caudal-sacrum, p 0.002, 1.0-2.0 ), but also had increased axial-rotation at withers-T13 (p = 0.02, 1.7 ) and increased flexion-extension at poll-withers (p < 0.001, 2.7 ). Trotting increased axial-rotation at all sites by 1.9-7.6 (p < 0.001), except poll-withers, but reduced lateral-bending at all sites by 0.4-8.3(p < 0.001), except L3-sacrum.Soft surfaces increased rotational range of movements, by 0.2-2.4 , in the 12/18 significant surface comparisons (p 0.03).Main limitations: Walk and trot speeds varied.Conclusions: These data will help to develop an equine back dynamics reference framework, to which individuals may be compared.Further work will explore these data in the context of horse movement asymmetry, age, stride duration, breed and objective surface properties.

Equine Veterinary JournalVol. 56(S59)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.