The Impacts of the Analysis, Debate, and Finding Models on Learning Natural Sciences

Problem solving of low critical thinking skills, difficulty in practicing science skills, analyzing students' concepts in depth and low learning outcomes are serious problems that must be solved. This experimental study aims to compare critical thinking skills, science skills, students' analytical skills and learning outcomes between the two groups, namely the pre-test and post-test control groups. This study involved 26 students of grade 5 SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency, totaling 26 students. The results showed that students had critical thinking skills, practicing science skills, and analyzing students' concepts in depth who believed that knowledge related to the material must be justified in various ways that showed broader and positive epistemics as evidenced by a significant increase in the science learning outcomes of grade 5 students of SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency with a learning model of debate, analysis, and findings through experimental methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qubahan Academic Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a189
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impacts of the Analysis, Debate, and Finding Models on Learning Natural Sciences

Randi Eka Putra, Megawati Megawati, Dodi Harianto, Wiwik Pudjaningsih et al.
Qubahan Academic Journal
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

The Impacts of the Analysis, Debate, and Finding Models on Learning Natural Sciences

Randi Eka Putra, Megawati Megawati, Dodi Harianto, Wiwik Pudjaningsih, Elfa Eriyani, Apdoludin Apdoludin
article en

Abstract

Problem solving of low critical thinking skills, difficulty in practicing science skills, analyzing students' concepts in depth and low learning outcomes are serious problems that must be solved. This experimental study aims to compare critical thinking skills, science skills, students' analytical skills and learning outcomes between the two groups, namely the pre-test and post-test control groups. This study involved 26 students of grade 5 SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency, totaling 26 students. The results showed that students had critical thinking skills, practicing science skills, and analyzing students' concepts in depth who believed that knowledge related to the material must be justified in various ways that showed broader and positive epistemics as evidenced by a significant increase in the science learning outcomes of grade 5 students of SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency with a learning model of debate, analysis, and findings through experimental methods.

Qubahan Academic JournalVol. 4(3)
Universitas Jambi (ID), Universitas Muara Bungo (ID), Universitas Merdeka Malang (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember (ID), Education and Early Childhood Development (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impacts of the Analysis, Debate, and Finding Models on Learning Natural Sciences — Randi Eka Putra, Megawati Megawati, et al. · Qubahan Academic Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS