Geophysics: Non-Invasive Techniques to Characterize Subsurface Geologic Conditions and Potential Hazards along Proposed Pipeline Alignments

Geophysical testing can provide important geotechnical and geologic information along proposed pipeline alignments, trenchless crossings, such as a river or creek, or along any location where more information regarding subsurface conditions is needed. Geophysical testing results in continuous profiles of the subsurface that can “connect the dots” between geotechnical borings in areas where the subsurface geology is highly variable and/or hazards may be present. The most common geophysical methods for such work include seismic testing (refraction and MASW), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), and ground penetrating radar (GPR). Some specific applications include bedrock mapping, hazard investigations (voids and failing soils), stratigraphic analysis, rock rippability, karst investigations, and hydrogeologic investigations. Pyramid Geophysics has utilized ERT to examine geologic conditions in karst environment to identify voids and solution channels along a proposed horizontal directional drill (HDD) alignment in Nashville, TN. Specifically, the geophysical results were incorporated into a geotechnical model using GIS data to present locations where the proposed HDD may encounter air-filled voids and significant weathering/dissolution within a limestone formation. Pyramid has also used a combination of seismic MASW testing and ERT to examine bedrock depth and integrity (e.g., fractures, weathered zones) along sections of alignment both on land and across rivers in submerged environments in Central North Carolina. Correlations were made between seismic velocity thresholds, electrical resistivity levels, and geotechnical boring refusal depths to provide continuous geologic profiles along an alignment exhibiting significant topographic and geologic variability. This paper will provide background on these various geophysical methods and case studies, showing the benefit of combining geophysical investigations with traditional geotechnical approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485569.009
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geophysics: Non-Invasive Techniques to Characterize Subsurface Geologic Conditions and Potential Hazards along Proposed Pipeline Alignments

Eric C. Cross
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Geophysics: Non-Invasive Techniques to Characterize Subsurface Geologic Conditions and Potential Hazards along Proposed Pipeline Alignments

Eric C. Cross
article en

Abstract

Geophysical testing can provide important geotechnical and geologic information along proposed pipeline alignments, trenchless crossings, such as a river or creek, or along any location where more information regarding subsurface conditions is needed. Geophysical testing results in continuous profiles of the subsurface that can “connect the dots” between geotechnical borings in areas where the subsurface geology is highly variable and/or hazards may be present. The most common geophysical methods for such work include seismic testing (refraction and MASW), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), and ground penetrating radar (GPR). Some specific applications include bedrock mapping, hazard investigations (voids and failing soils), stratigraphic analysis, rock rippability, karst investigations, and hydrogeologic investigations. Pyramid Geophysics has utilized ERT to examine geologic conditions in karst environment to identify voids and solution channels along a proposed horizontal directional drill (HDD) alignment in Nashville, TN. Specifically, the geophysical results were incorporated into a geotechnical model using GIS data to present locations where the proposed HDD may encounter air-filled voids and significant weathering/dissolution within a limestone formation. Pyramid has also used a combination of seismic MASW testing and ERT to examine bedrock depth and integrity (e.g., fractures, weathered zones) along sections of alignment both on land and across rivers in submerged environments in Central North Carolina. Correlations were made between seismic velocity thresholds, electrical resistivity levels, and geotechnical boring refusal depths to provide continuous geologic profiles along an alignment exhibiting significant topographic and geologic variability. This paper will provide background on these various geophysical methods and case studies, showing the benefit of combining geophysical investigations with traditional geotechnical approaches.

Institute of Applied Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.