627 Using the novel injury equity framework to address global inequities in injury outcomes

<h3>Background</h3> The Injury Equity Framework is a novel integration of the Haddon Matrix and the Cliff of Good Health by Jones et al that was developed to systematically identify and address factors which contribute to inequities in injury outcomes. First published in US literature and designed to address US based inequities, it includes historical and current societal factors as the context in which inequities occur. The context overlaps with societal factors and the intersectionality of individual, family, and community identities of an individual or group. The pre-event, event, and post-event phases of injury, as well as various contributors and countermeasures from the Haddon Matrix including the built environment, legislation and policy, education, equipment and technology, and treatment and recovery are included. <h3>Objective &amp; Practice Description</h3> The objective was to utilize components of the Injury Equity Framework to identify factors contributing to global inequities in injury outcomes based on available literature. The practice begins with a robust literature search on the burden of injuries in low- and middle-income countries and factors that may contribute to the burden. The results of the literature search were used to identify specific components of each category of the Injury Equity Framework as they apply to global inequities. <h3>Outcomes and Learnings</h3> Like inequities in the US, global inequities are complex and multifactorial, but do include identifiable and addressable components. For example, a factor in the pre-event phase is a paucity of systematic data collection such as the lack of trauma registries in Botswana. The event phase includes built environment features such as an absence of pedestrian crosswalks. The post-event phase includes treatment and recovery factors such as an absence of widely accessible trauma and rehabilitation care. <h3>Implications</h3> If the identifiable and addressable components, as illuminated by the Injury Equity Framework, are targeted, global inequities in injury outcomes could be significantly reduced over time. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The Injury Equity Framework is a tool that can be used by multidisciplinary teams including policy makers, injury prevention program directors, public health practitioners and others to identify and address the complex factors which together contribute to global injury inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.313
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

627 Using the novel injury equity framework to address global inequities in injury outcomes

Michelle L. Macy, Sadiqa Kendi, Mark R. Zonfrillo
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

627 Using the novel injury equity framework to address global inequities in injury outcomes

Michelle L. Macy, Sadiqa Kendi, Mark R. Zonfrillo
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> The Injury Equity Framework is a novel integration of the Haddon Matrix and the Cliff of Good Health by Jones et al that was developed to systematically identify and address factors which contribute to inequities in injury outcomes. First published in US literature and designed to address US based inequities, it includes historical and current societal factors as the context in which inequities occur. The context overlaps with societal factors and the intersectionality of individual, family, and community identities of an individual or group. The pre-event, event, and post-event phases of injury, as well as various contributors and countermeasures from the Haddon Matrix including the built environment, legislation and policy, education, equipment and technology, and treatment and recovery are included. <h3>Objective &amp; Practice Description</h3> The objective was to utilize components of the Injury Equity Framework to identify factors contributing to global inequities in injury outcomes based on available literature. The practice begins with a robust literature search on the burden of injuries in low- and middle-income countries and factors that may contribute to the burden. The results of the literature search were used to identify specific components of each category of the Injury Equity Framework as they apply to global inequities. <h3>Outcomes and Learnings</h3> Like inequities in the US, global inequities are complex and multifactorial, but do include identifiable and addressable components. For example, a factor in the pre-event phase is a paucity of systematic data collection such as the lack of trauma registries in Botswana. The event phase includes built environment features such as an absence of pedestrian crosswalks. The post-event phase includes treatment and recovery factors such as an absence of widely accessible trauma and rehabilitation care. <h3>Implications</h3> If the identifiable and addressable components, as illuminated by the Injury Equity Framework, are targeted, global inequities in injury outcomes could be significantly reduced over time. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The Injury Equity Framework is a tool that can be used by multidisciplinary teams including policy makers, injury prevention program directors, public health practitioners and others to identify and address the complex factors which together contribute to global injury inequities.

Boston Medical Center (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Hasbro Children's Hospital (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.