633 Survey-based six-country comparison of drink driving, enforcement, crashes, and crash reporting

<h3>Background</h3> Especially in middle-income countries, crash intervention and burden analyses/policymaking often rely on assumptions supported by data from the United States (US). <h3>Objective</h3> Using survey data, to compare driver behavior and crash characteristics in the US, Belgium, Brazil, China, Mexico, and South Africa. <h3>Data Sources</h3> In each country, we conducted face-to-face interviews with the same highway safety questions (translated into six languages) using stratified samples of 1300 to 6000 adult respondents spread across two mid-sized cities, except the US survey was by mail. The survey primarily focused on alcohol consumption patterns. Survey dates: 2018/19 or 2023. <h3>Methods</h3> Survey data weighted to match local censuses. Differences between countries assessed with Fishers exact test, t-tests, logit regression. <h3>Results</h3> Driving without a license was rare except in Mexico (30%) and a Brasilia exurb (26%). Among those who drove, self-reported alcohol-impaired driving rates were: 15% Belgium, 20% Brazil, 5% China, 9% Mexico, 20% South Africa, 14% US. The percentage of those who drove drunk in the past year who police stopped for drunk driving varied widely: 53% Belgium, 21% Brazil, 60% China and Mexico, 93% South Africa, 3% (sic) in the US. Drivers passing through a sobriety checkpoint were: 27% Belgium, 53% Brazil and China, 38% Mexico, 5% US. Use of an app or social media to avoid police when driving after drinking was most common in Brazil (17% of drivers) and South Africa (13%), lowest in the US (1%). The percentage of respondents riding with someone they thought was intoxicated in the past year was: 26% Belgium, 9% China. 18%-19% Brazil and Mexico, 12% US. Crash data were not collected in South Africa. The surveys yielded data on 380 crashes. Police crash reporting rates were: 56% Brazil , 69% US, 61%-63% elsewhere. The percentage of crashes involving death or injury was: 16% US, 24% Mexico, 31%-34% elsewhere. Perceived crash alcohol involvement rates were: 19% Belgium, 32% Brazil, 41% China, 57% Mexico, 13% US. <h3>Conclusions</h3> US data are poor surrogates for driving parameters elsewhere, notably urban police crash reporting. US impaired driving enforcement is far worse than in these comparison countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.317
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

633 Survey-based six-country comparison of drink driving, enforcement, crashes, and crash reporting

Tom Achoki, Ted R. Miller, Elizabeth Lilliott, Joel W. Grube et al.
Traffic and Road Safety
article

633 Survey-based six-country comparison of drink driving, enforcement, crashes, and crash reporting

Tom Achoki, Ted R. Miller, Elizabeth Lilliott, Joel W. Grube, Christopher L. Ringwalt, Deborah A. Fisher
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Especially in middle-income countries, crash intervention and burden analyses/policymaking often rely on assumptions supported by data from the United States (US). <h3>Objective</h3> Using survey data, to compare driver behavior and crash characteristics in the US, Belgium, Brazil, China, Mexico, and South Africa. <h3>Data Sources</h3> In each country, we conducted face-to-face interviews with the same highway safety questions (translated into six languages) using stratified samples of 1300 to 6000 adult respondents spread across two mid-sized cities, except the US survey was by mail. The survey primarily focused on alcohol consumption patterns. Survey dates: 2018/19 or 2023. <h3>Methods</h3> Survey data weighted to match local censuses. Differences between countries assessed with Fishers exact test, t-tests, logit regression. <h3>Results</h3> Driving without a license was rare except in Mexico (30%) and a Brasilia exurb (26%). Among those who drove, self-reported alcohol-impaired driving rates were: 15% Belgium, 20% Brazil, 5% China, 9% Mexico, 20% South Africa, 14% US. The percentage of those who drove drunk in the past year who police stopped for drunk driving varied widely: 53% Belgium, 21% Brazil, 60% China and Mexico, 93% South Africa, 3% (sic) in the US. Drivers passing through a sobriety checkpoint were: 27% Belgium, 53% Brazil and China, 38% Mexico, 5% US. Use of an app or social media to avoid police when driving after drinking was most common in Brazil (17% of drivers) and South Africa (13%), lowest in the US (1%). The percentage of respondents riding with someone they thought was intoxicated in the past year was: 26% Belgium, 9% China. 18%-19% Brazil and Mexico, 12% US. Crash data were not collected in South Africa. The surveys yielded data on 380 crashes. Police crash reporting rates were: 56% Brazil , 69% US, 61%-63% elsewhere. The percentage of crashes involving death or injury was: 16% US, 24% Mexico, 31%-34% elsewhere. Perceived crash alcohol involvement rates were: 19% Belgium, 32% Brazil, 41% China, 57% Mexico, 13% US. <h3>Conclusions</h3> US data are poor surrogates for driving parameters elsewhere, notably urban police crash reporting. US impaired driving enforcement is far worse than in these comparison countries.

Curtin University (AU), Institute for Research and Evaluation (US), Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US), Anheuser-Busch InBev (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.