272 The impact of indirect transport to a trauma centre on short-term survival for major trauma patients

<h3>Background</h3> An optimally structured prehospital trauma care system can reduce the serious consequences of many injuries. Whether all major trauma patients should be directed to a trauma centre (TC), bypassing closer lower-level hospitals, is a contentious issue. In particular, it is unclear if direct transport reduces risk of death. <h3>Objective</h3> To explore the relationship between direct versus indirect transfer to a definitive care hospital on short-term survival following major trauma in Aotearoa-New Zealand (NZ). <h3>Methods</h3> This prospective cohort study using administrative data analysed patients aged &lt;85 years with major trauma (Injury Severity Score&gt;12) attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) who were admitted to a TC, either directly or indirectly. Patients for whom there was no intermediary hospital closer than the TC (ie direct was the obvious option) were excluded. Propensity scores were obtained from a logistic regression model with directness of transport to definitive care as the outcome variable and all other available variables accessible at the time of EMS retrieval and considered to be related to mortality. Crude and adjusted mortality rate were estimated using a generalised linear Poisson regression model with a log-link function and robust standard errors. <h3>Results</h3> Of 1,008 major trauma cases meeting the eligibility criteria, 370 (36.7%) had pathways to definitive care that involved one intermediary hospital. Similar percentages of direct and indirectly transported patients died within 30 days following the EMS call (8.9% and 10.0% respectively). The propensity-weighted adjusted model estimated an 8% lower 2-week mortality (95% CI -41%, 44%) for those that were transported indirectly compared to directly. For 30-day mortality, the adjusted relative risk estimate was 21% lower mortality (95% CI -48%, 19%) for those transported indirectly. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Study findings suggest that in NZ, major trauma patients secondarily transferred to TCs may have decreased mortality when compared to directly transported patients, although there was considerable uncertainty with these estimates. Residual confounding from the observational study design is a limitation as is the relatively small sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.141
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

272 The impact of indirect transport to a trauma centre on short-term survival for major trauma patients

Bridget Dicker, Ian Civil, Rebbecca Lilley, Shanthi Ameratunga et al.
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

272 The impact of indirect transport to a trauma centre on short-term survival for major trauma patients

Bridget Dicker, Ian Civil, Rebbecca Lilley, Shanthi Ameratunga, Bridget Kool, Papaarangi Reid, Charles C. Branas, Nicola Campbell, Luisa Montoya, Brandon de Graaf
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> An optimally structured prehospital trauma care system can reduce the serious consequences of many injuries. Whether all major trauma patients should be directed to a trauma centre (TC), bypassing closer lower-level hospitals, is a contentious issue. In particular, it is unclear if direct transport reduces risk of death. <h3>Objective</h3> To explore the relationship between direct versus indirect transfer to a definitive care hospital on short-term survival following major trauma in Aotearoa-New Zealand (NZ). <h3>Methods</h3> This prospective cohort study using administrative data analysed patients aged &lt;85 years with major trauma (Injury Severity Score&gt;12) attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) who were admitted to a TC, either directly or indirectly. Patients for whom there was no intermediary hospital closer than the TC (ie direct was the obvious option) were excluded. Propensity scores were obtained from a logistic regression model with directness of transport to definitive care as the outcome variable and all other available variables accessible at the time of EMS retrieval and considered to be related to mortality. Crude and adjusted mortality rate were estimated using a generalised linear Poisson regression model with a log-link function and robust standard errors. <h3>Results</h3> Of 1,008 major trauma cases meeting the eligibility criteria, 370 (36.7%) had pathways to definitive care that involved one intermediary hospital. Similar percentages of direct and indirectly transported patients died within 30 days following the EMS call (8.9% and 10.0% respectively). The propensity-weighted adjusted model estimated an 8% lower 2-week mortality (95% CI -41%, 44%) for those that were transported indirectly compared to directly. For 30-day mortality, the adjusted relative risk estimate was 21% lower mortality (95% CI -48%, 19%) for those transported indirectly. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Study findings suggest that in NZ, major trauma patients secondarily transferred to TCs may have decreased mortality when compared to directly transported patients, although there was considerable uncertainty with these estimates. Residual confounding from the observational study design is a limitation as is the relatively small sample size.

University of Otago (NZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.