Population response of eastern wild turkey to removal of wild pigs

Abstract There is insufficient understanding of interspecific interactions with the eastern wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) and wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ). Wild pigs compete with wild turkeys and predate nests and adults; however, population‐level effects on wild turkeys are not clear. Using cameras, we assessed responses of wild turkey populations to wild pig removal in central Alabama, USA, from 2018–2021. We compared wild turkey relative abundance and occupancy on 3 large‐scale pig‐removal treatment sites (3,407–5,531 ha) relative to a control site (2,510 ha) during 1 pre‐treatment year and 2 post‐treatment years, with analyses including a covariate expressing the cumulative number of pigs removed from each site standardized by the initial pig abundance on the site. We removed 1,851 wild pigs from the 3 treatment sites over 22 months. Based on N‐mixture modeling, when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates (i.e., 100% removal relative to initial population), there were 1.50 (95% CL = 1.01–2.23) times as many wild turkeys, and detection of wild turkeys was 2.01 (95% CL = 1.49–2.70) times as likely. Additionally, poults were 3.49 (95% CL = 1.12–10.89) times as likely to occupy an area when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with poult occupancy at baseline pig abundance. Our data suggests that reduction of wild pig populations may lead to a localized increase in populations of wild turkeys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22662
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population response of eastern wild turkey to removal of wild pigs

Matthew T. McDonough, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Robert A. Gitzen, Kurt C. VerCauteren et al.
4 citations
Journal of Wildlife Management
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
1.36
article

Population response of eastern wild turkey to removal of wild pigs

Matthew T. McDonough, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Robert A. Gitzen, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Stephen J. Zenas, Mark D. Smith
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is insufficient understanding of interspecific interactions with the eastern wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) and wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ). Wild pigs compete with wild turkeys and predate nests and adults; however, population‐level effects on wild turkeys are not clear. Using cameras, we assessed responses of wild turkey populations to wild pig removal in central Alabama, USA, from 2018–2021. We compared wild turkey relative abundance and occupancy on 3 large‐scale pig‐removal treatment sites (3,407–5,531 ha) relative to a control site (2,510 ha) during 1 pre‐treatment year and 2 post‐treatment years, with analyses including a covariate expressing the cumulative number of pigs removed from each site standardized by the initial pig abundance on the site. We removed 1,851 wild pigs from the 3 treatment sites over 22 months. Based on N‐mixture modeling, when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates (i.e., 100% removal relative to initial population), there were 1.50 (95% CL = 1.01–2.23) times as many wild turkeys, and detection of wild turkeys was 2.01 (95% CL = 1.49–2.70) times as likely. Additionally, poults were 3.49 (95% CL = 1.12–10.89) times as likely to occupy an area when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with poult occupancy at baseline pig abundance. Our data suggests that reduction of wild pig populations may lead to a localized increase in populations of wild turkeys.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 88(8)
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), Life Services (United States) (US), National Wildlife Research Center, Auburn University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.