492 Assessment of the enabling environment for road safety civil society organizations in three sub-Saharan African countries

<h3>Background</h3> Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) play a pivotal role in influencing government’s decision-making in road safety, but in order to meaningfully participate in this process, they need an environment that enables them to exist and effectively operate. <h3>Objective</h3> The purpose of this study was to generate research-based guidance on the enabling environment (EE) of road safety CSOs in three sub-Saharan countries (Ethiopia, Uganda and Zambia), thus contributing to the development of global, regional and country capacity to support the sustainable reduction in road traffic injury deaths. <h3>Methods</h3> This was a mixed methods study consisting of an online survey of members of road safety CSOs and in-depth interviews of government employees who were involved in road safety policy making and/or program implementation in the three countries. Participants were asked about collaboration between road safety CSOs and government, policies to support collaboration, and restrictions on road safety CSO activities. These activities were supplemented by desk review and in-person workshops to develop an EE framework. <h3>Results</h3> The overall environment was somewhat positive with some areas of difficulty and disagreement. CSO members in Ethiopia reported some difficulties accessing information, less cooperation, and less influence on policy changes than in the other two countries. Government officials reported that CSOs were free from activity restriction while CSO members in Ethiopia and Uganda reported some restrictions. There were differing opinions about existence of policies to support collaboration. An EE framework was developed with three domains for understanding road safety CSO-government engagement: legal and regulatory environment, political and governance environment, and policy environment. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The EE is a key factor in the effectiveness of CSO efforts to cooperate with government to implement life-saving road safety policies and programs. We found that despite some difficulties, road safety CSOs and government are finding many ways to work together. We recommend implementation of the EE framework as a way to establish a regular dialogue between government and CSOs on ways to improve CSO-government working relationships for improved road safety outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.246
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

492 Assessment of the enabling environment for road safety civil society organizations in three sub-Saharan African countries

Heather Rosen, Chika Sakashita, Nino Paichadze, Shubha Kapuganti
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

492 Assessment of the enabling environment for road safety civil society organizations in three sub-Saharan African countries

Heather Rosen, Chika Sakashita, Nino Paichadze, Shubha Kapuganti
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) play a pivotal role in influencing government’s decision-making in road safety, but in order to meaningfully participate in this process, they need an environment that enables them to exist and effectively operate. <h3>Objective</h3> The purpose of this study was to generate research-based guidance on the enabling environment (EE) of road safety CSOs in three sub-Saharan countries (Ethiopia, Uganda and Zambia), thus contributing to the development of global, regional and country capacity to support the sustainable reduction in road traffic injury deaths. <h3>Methods</h3> This was a mixed methods study consisting of an online survey of members of road safety CSOs and in-depth interviews of government employees who were involved in road safety policy making and/or program implementation in the three countries. Participants were asked about collaboration between road safety CSOs and government, policies to support collaboration, and restrictions on road safety CSO activities. These activities were supplemented by desk review and in-person workshops to develop an EE framework. <h3>Results</h3> The overall environment was somewhat positive with some areas of difficulty and disagreement. CSO members in Ethiopia reported some difficulties accessing information, less cooperation, and less influence on policy changes than in the other two countries. Government officials reported that CSOs were free from activity restriction while CSO members in Ethiopia and Uganda reported some restrictions. There were differing opinions about existence of policies to support collaboration. An EE framework was developed with three domains for understanding road safety CSO-government engagement: legal and regulatory environment, political and governance environment, and policy environment. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The EE is a key factor in the effectiveness of CSO efforts to cooperate with government to implement life-saving road safety policies and programs. We found that despite some difficulties, road safety CSOs and government are finding many ways to work together. We recommend implementation of the EE framework as a way to establish a regular dialogue between government and CSOs on ways to improve CSO-government working relationships for improved road safety outcomes.

Milken Institute (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.