444 How does culture influence public support for road safety policy measures?

<h3>Background</h3> Policymakers are often reluctant to implement road safety policy measures because of they fear the public support will be low. Opposition to measures is rooted in people’s expectations about several issues, including effectiveness, costs, burdens, restrictions on freedom and possible discrimination. Little evidence is available about how countries differ in terms of public support for road safety policy measures. Another limitation is that most studies refer to only one country and only one or a few specific measures. <h3>Objective</h3> The aim of the research was to get a better understanding of the role of culture and other factors in public support for road safety policy measures. <h3>Methods</h3> In addition to secondary data analysis (ESRA) covering 60 countries and interviews with 40 people in five countries, a survey was conducted in twelve regions and countries (Texas, California, China, Greater London, Austria, Sweden, Greece, Flanders, Wallonia, West of France, Nigeria, and Argentina). Respondents were presented with ten possible road safety measures and asked whether they would support or oppose them, what arguments their opinion was based on, and what the effect of the measure would be on them individually. Over 5000 people participated in the survey. In each country or region; the sample of respondents was representative for the adult population. <h3>Results</h3> The findings show considerable variation across countries in public support for road safety policy measure. Culture, in particular traffic safety culture, is often an important factor in opposing or supporting interventions for road safety. This is particularly the case when measures are felt to restrict mobility, seen as discriminatory and/or perceived as an unjustifiable intervention of the state. Very large differences exist in the expected personal effects between the opponents and supporters of a measure, suggesting that such different expectations are decisive for the willingness to support policy. measures. <h3>Conclusions</h3> People from different countries vary in what they consider fair and unfair, which is linked to the national culture and organization of society. For example, many more Americans than non-Americans consider the policy measures to be an unjustifiable state intervention; the opposite was the case in China.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.217
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

444 How does culture influence public support for road safety policy measures?

Wouter Van den Berghe
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

444 How does culture influence public support for road safety policy measures?

Wouter Van den Berghe
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Policymakers are often reluctant to implement road safety policy measures because of they fear the public support will be low. Opposition to measures is rooted in people’s expectations about several issues, including effectiveness, costs, burdens, restrictions on freedom and possible discrimination. Little evidence is available about how countries differ in terms of public support for road safety policy measures. Another limitation is that most studies refer to only one country and only one or a few specific measures. <h3>Objective</h3> The aim of the research was to get a better understanding of the role of culture and other factors in public support for road safety policy measures. <h3>Methods</h3> In addition to secondary data analysis (ESRA) covering 60 countries and interviews with 40 people in five countries, a survey was conducted in twelve regions and countries (Texas, California, China, Greater London, Austria, Sweden, Greece, Flanders, Wallonia, West of France, Nigeria, and Argentina). Respondents were presented with ten possible road safety measures and asked whether they would support or oppose them, what arguments their opinion was based on, and what the effect of the measure would be on them individually. Over 5000 people participated in the survey. In each country or region; the sample of respondents was representative for the adult population. <h3>Results</h3> The findings show considerable variation across countries in public support for road safety policy measure. Culture, in particular traffic safety culture, is often an important factor in opposing or supporting interventions for road safety. This is particularly the case when measures are felt to restrict mobility, seen as discriminatory and/or perceived as an unjustifiable intervention of the state. Very large differences exist in the expected personal effects between the opponents and supporters of a measure, suggesting that such different expectations are decisive for the willingness to support policy. measures. <h3>Conclusions</h3> People from different countries vary in what they consider fair and unfair, which is linked to the national culture and organization of society. For example, many more Americans than non-Americans consider the policy measures to be an unjustifiable state intervention; the opposite was the case in China.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

444 How does culture influence public support for road safety policy measures? — Wouter Van den Berghe · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS