Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Geohazards

Many gas and liquid pipelines traverse unstable landscapes, such as waterways, floodplains, and steep terrain. These unstable landscapes often pose threats to pipeline stability and integrity. A variety of approaches are available to better understand and predict the magnitude and frequency of natural forces (geohazards) that threaten pipeline integrity. Risks of pipeline failures from these threats are of high concern to the industry, and the risks escalate significantly in high consequence areas. One approach is to prioritize vulnerable pipelines by assessing and prioritizing them through a combination of publicly available data, operator knowledge, and site-specific information (e.g., pipeline characteristics, recent survey data, etc.). The objective is for hydrologists, geologists, engineers, and environmental scientists to evaluate potential failure risk for those pipelines for which a refined understanding of vulnerability is desired. Depending on the results/outputs of a pipeline natural forces assessment, it may then be critical to understand requirements to permit, design, and implement recommended actions to minimize potential risk at pipeline segments of concern—through monitoring plans, operational controls, and/or engineering controls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485590.011
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Geohazards

Jeffrey J. Budzich, Qing Lan
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Geohazards

Jeffrey J. Budzich, Qing Lan
article en

Abstract

Many gas and liquid pipelines traverse unstable landscapes, such as waterways, floodplains, and steep terrain. These unstable landscapes often pose threats to pipeline stability and integrity. A variety of approaches are available to better understand and predict the magnitude and frequency of natural forces (geohazards) that threaten pipeline integrity. Risks of pipeline failures from these threats are of high concern to the industry, and the risks escalate significantly in high consequence areas. One approach is to prioritize vulnerable pipelines by assessing and prioritizing them through a combination of publicly available data, operator knowledge, and site-specific information (e.g., pipeline characteristics, recent survey data, etc.). The objective is for hydrologists, geologists, engineers, and environmental scientists to evaluate potential failure risk for those pipelines for which a refined understanding of vulnerability is desired. Depending on the results/outputs of a pipeline natural forces assessment, it may then be critical to understand requirements to permit, design, and implement recommended actions to minimize potential risk at pipeline segments of concern—through monitoring plans, operational controls, and/or engineering controls.

Suncor Energy (Canada) (CA), Arcadis (United States) (US), Arcadis (Czechia) (CZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.