64 COVID-19 policies and inflicted violence injuries among children and youth in Canada

<h3>Background</h3> In March 2020, lockdown measures were implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19 infection across Canada. This policy indirectly impacted several health outcomes, including inflicted violence injuries among children and youth. Anecdotally, an increase in cases was hypothesized due to changes in social and family dynamics due to the stay at home policies introduced. <h3>Objective</h3> The objective of this research was to examine the effect of the initial COVID-19 policy implemented in March 2020 in two provinces in Canada (Ontario, British Columbia). We aimed to describe the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations among children and youth ages 0 – 19 years. <h3>Policy Analysis</h3> We used an interrupted time series analysis to examine the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations before the pandemic (previous to March 2020) with those during the pandemic (after March 2020) in both provinces. Our model examined if implementation of the policy impacted age groups (0–9, 10–19), and sex (male, female), differently. <h3>Policy Implications</h3> There was a significant, 35% decrease in the rate of hospitalizations (RR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82) after implementing lockdown policies in the province of Ontario, after controlling for relevant covariates. There was no discernable change in the rate of violence injury hospitalizations in British Columbia. Finally, we report no significant change in hospitalizations by age group or sex when examining interaction effects of the policy. This policy analysis focused on an indirect health impact of lockdown measures on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. <h3>Conclusions</h3> There was a significant decrease in the rate of violence-related hospitalizations at implementation of the first COVID-19 policy in Ontario, but this was not observed in British Columbia. We hypothesize that a significant number of injuries did not present to hospital in Ontario during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the implementation of lockdown measures and fear of COVID-19 infection. Increased surveillance mechanisms to capture and address the number of unreported violence cases in children and youth is required during emergency public health crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abstracts
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.21
Primary Topic
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

64 COVID-19 policies and inflicted violence injuries among children and youth in Canada

Breanna Nelson, Alex Zheng, Alison Macpherson, Fahra Rajabali et al.
Abstracts
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
article

64 COVID-19 policies and inflicted violence injuries among children and youth in Canada

Breanna Nelson, Alex Zheng, Alison Macpherson, Fahra Rajabali, Alexia Medeiros, Ian Pike, Sarah A. Richmond
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> In March 2020, lockdown measures were implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19 infection across Canada. This policy indirectly impacted several health outcomes, including inflicted violence injuries among children and youth. Anecdotally, an increase in cases was hypothesized due to changes in social and family dynamics due to the stay at home policies introduced. <h3>Objective</h3> The objective of this research was to examine the effect of the initial COVID-19 policy implemented in March 2020 in two provinces in Canada (Ontario, British Columbia). We aimed to describe the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations among children and youth ages 0 – 19 years. <h3>Policy Analysis</h3> We used an interrupted time series analysis to examine the change in the number of violence-related hospitalizations before the pandemic (previous to March 2020) with those during the pandemic (after March 2020) in both provinces. Our model examined if implementation of the policy impacted age groups (0–9, 10–19), and sex (male, female), differently. <h3>Policy Implications</h3> There was a significant, 35% decrease in the rate of hospitalizations (RR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82) after implementing lockdown policies in the province of Ontario, after controlling for relevant covariates. There was no discernable change in the rate of violence injury hospitalizations in British Columbia. Finally, we report no significant change in hospitalizations by age group or sex when examining interaction effects of the policy. This policy analysis focused on an indirect health impact of lockdown measures on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. <h3>Conclusions</h3> There was a significant decrease in the rate of violence-related hospitalizations at implementation of the first COVID-19 policy in Ontario, but this was not observed in British Columbia. We hypothesize that a significant number of injuries did not present to hospital in Ontario during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the implementation of lockdown measures and fear of COVID-19 infection. Increased surveillance mechanisms to capture and address the number of unreported violence cases in children and youth is required during emergency public health crises.

Abstracts
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.