203 Hitting the target: what 75% travel means for cyclists and women

<h3>Background</h3> During the United Nations General Assembly of 2018, the UN Member States agreed on 12 Global Road Safety Performance Targets to drive action worldwide to prevent fatalities and severe injuries. Target 4 establishes that more than 75% of travel on existing roads is on roads that meet technical standards for all road users considering road safety. Since the declaration, two questions have arisen to clarify where countries should direct their investments on existing roads: (a) how to identify if the road meets the technical standards and (b) where 75% of travel is happening. It is essential to underscore that Target 4 explicitly includes all road users. However, especially in cities where the modal split is unfavourable to cyclists, calculating the 75% of travel routes considering all trips might bias the investments to continue to be redirected to more prevalent travel modes. Neglecting the travel demands of other travel modes, like pedestrians and cyclists, can intimidate new users and even deteriorate current travellers’ road safety conditions. The lack of safe infrastructure has been documented as a critical barrier for cyclists in studies around the globe. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to pinpoint the routes constituting 75% of travel for cyclists, comparing them with other modes, analysing potential gender-based variations, and assessing the safety of roads for cyclists. <h3>Methods</h3> The analyses are built on origin-destination data collected in the city of São Paulo (RSMP) 2017. The cyclists’ routes were identified using the OpenRouteService tool on the software QGIS. <h3>Results</h3> Route-generated links were ranked by the highest number of passing routes and the links with the 75% of travels per mode were identified and compared with the cyclists’ map. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The cyclist maps were also compared by gender, highlighting the differences in the origin and destination locations for men and women. Finally, where the road assessment results are available for the city of São Paulo, it was checked if the routes meet the Target 4 for cyclists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Abstracts
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.99
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

203 Hitting the target: what 75% travel means for cyclists and women

Greg Smith, Monica Olyslagers, Shanna Lucchesi
Abstracts
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

203 Hitting the target: what 75% travel means for cyclists and women

Greg Smith, Monica Olyslagers, Shanna Lucchesi
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> During the United Nations General Assembly of 2018, the UN Member States agreed on 12 Global Road Safety Performance Targets to drive action worldwide to prevent fatalities and severe injuries. Target 4 establishes that more than 75% of travel on existing roads is on roads that meet technical standards for all road users considering road safety. Since the declaration, two questions have arisen to clarify where countries should direct their investments on existing roads: (a) how to identify if the road meets the technical standards and (b) where 75% of travel is happening. It is essential to underscore that Target 4 explicitly includes all road users. However, especially in cities where the modal split is unfavourable to cyclists, calculating the 75% of travel routes considering all trips might bias the investments to continue to be redirected to more prevalent travel modes. Neglecting the travel demands of other travel modes, like pedestrians and cyclists, can intimidate new users and even deteriorate current travellers’ road safety conditions. The lack of safe infrastructure has been documented as a critical barrier for cyclists in studies around the globe. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to pinpoint the routes constituting 75% of travel for cyclists, comparing them with other modes, analysing potential gender-based variations, and assessing the safety of roads for cyclists. <h3>Methods</h3> The analyses are built on origin-destination data collected in the city of São Paulo (RSMP) 2017. The cyclists’ routes were identified using the OpenRouteService tool on the software QGIS. <h3>Results</h3> Route-generated links were ranked by the highest number of passing routes and the links with the 75% of travels per mode were identified and compared with the cyclists’ map. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The cyclist maps were also compared by gender, highlighting the differences in the origin and destination locations for men and women. Finally, where the road assessment results are available for the city of São Paulo, it was checked if the routes meet the Target 4 for cyclists.

Abstracts
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.