218 The pilot implementation of the who clinical registry for emergency care

<h3>Background</h3> The WHO Clinical Registry is a platform for collecting, aggregating, and analysing case-based clinical care encounters, developed in response to country needs and to support systematic quality improvement. The emergency care module uses the WHO Dataset for Emergency Care, a minimum set of recommended data elements for emergency care presentations developed through global consensus. This module was recently piloted in collaboration with the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) . <h3>Objective</h3> The aim of this Project was to pilot the implementation of the WHO Clinical Registry - Emergency Care module and to evaluate its usability and acceptability. <h3>Methodology</h3> The emergency care module was implemented at seven sites, and we conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), structured to gather comprehensive insights from participants and responses were coded for thematic analysis. FGDs looked at: understanding the Registry, perceived value, facilitators and barriers for sustainable implementation, lessons learned, and resources required. The approach aimed to create an interactive and open environment in which participants could share their perspectives. <h3>Outcomes and Learnings</h3> The FGDs were able to create a structured yet open forum for participants to express their views, share experiences, and contribute to the evaluation of the implementation. The study leads gained a holistic understanding of participants’ perspectives, allowing for the identification of key themes and insights that can inform the roll out of the Clinical Registry. <h3>Implications</h3> The results of the pilot will be used to improve implementation, address barriers identified and increase effectiveness of the Clinical Registry, ensuring alignment with user needs. This iterative process of learning and refining will facilitate the improvement of the registry’s functionality, making it more user-friendly, straightforward to implement, and sustainable over time. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The emergency care module pilot study laid the foundation for refining the registry to better meet user needs and increase overall effectiveness. The improved version will facilitate for a more impactful implementation in diverse emergency care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2024-safety.108
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

218 The pilot implementation of the who clinical registry for emergency care

Lee Wallis, Gerard O’Reilly, Antoinette Vanessa Naidoo, Rose Mabelle Buhain et al.
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

218 The pilot implementation of the who clinical registry for emergency care

Lee Wallis, Gerard O’Reilly, Antoinette Vanessa Naidoo, Rose Mabelle Buhain, Sally Mc Carthy
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> The WHO Clinical Registry is a platform for collecting, aggregating, and analysing case-based clinical care encounters, developed in response to country needs and to support systematic quality improvement. The emergency care module uses the WHO Dataset for Emergency Care, a minimum set of recommended data elements for emergency care presentations developed through global consensus. This module was recently piloted in collaboration with the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) . <h3>Objective</h3> The aim of this Project was to pilot the implementation of the WHO Clinical Registry - Emergency Care module and to evaluate its usability and acceptability. <h3>Methodology</h3> The emergency care module was implemented at seven sites, and we conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), structured to gather comprehensive insights from participants and responses were coded for thematic analysis. FGDs looked at: understanding the Registry, perceived value, facilitators and barriers for sustainable implementation, lessons learned, and resources required. The approach aimed to create an interactive and open environment in which participants could share their perspectives. <h3>Outcomes and Learnings</h3> The FGDs were able to create a structured yet open forum for participants to express their views, share experiences, and contribute to the evaluation of the implementation. The study leads gained a holistic understanding of participants’ perspectives, allowing for the identification of key themes and insights that can inform the roll out of the Clinical Registry. <h3>Implications</h3> The results of the pilot will be used to improve implementation, address barriers identified and increase effectiveness of the Clinical Registry, ensuring alignment with user needs. This iterative process of learning and refining will facilitate the improvement of the registry’s functionality, making it more user-friendly, straightforward to implement, and sustainable over time. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The emergency care module pilot study laid the foundation for refining the registry to better meet user needs and increase overall effectiveness. The improved version will facilitate for a more impactful implementation in diverse emergency care settings.

African Federation for Emergency Medicine (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.